[gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] Fwd: [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

[sankarshan]

There are 2 specific bits which I expected to stimulate in discussion

[1] a review by the Gluster Infrastructure team in terms of whether
there is any change in the processes/environment
[2] whether the maintainers will consider reviewing this in entirety
and be able to assess the impact

To my knowledge this topic was not previously brought up at any of the
Gluster meetings, so it is worth requesting all parties involved to
take a moment to form their opinions and use appropriate forums to
discuss that.

On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 14:04, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:00:35PM +0530, sankarshan wrote:
> > FYI. Would likely be important in context of packaging, testing and
> > release content
>
> Indeed, we currently build packages in the CentOS Storage SIG against
> CentOS Linux, and not against CentOS Stream. But other than that, I do
> not expect major visible changes for our users.
>
> The main advantage is that we can more directly contribute to the
> distribution. CentOS Stream allows us to send PRs that get reviewed by
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux developers and potentially get included.  That
> means, enhancements to FUSE or other components do not need to rely on
> the work Red Hat is planning, but could be worked on by our community
> and get included earlier.
>
> If there are any concerns, I'd love to hear about it.
>
> Thanks,
> Niels


-- 
sankarshan at kadalu.io | TZ: UTC+0530 | +91 99606 03294
kadalu.io : Making it easy to provision storage in k8s!