[Gluster-users] Upgrade 5.3 -> 5.4 on debian: public IP is used instead of LAN IP
Nithya Balachandran
nbalacha at redhat.com
Wed Mar 20 03:26:55 UTC 2019
Hi Artem,
I think you are running into a different crash. The ones reported which
were prevented by turning off write-behind are now fixed.
We will need to look into the one you are seeing to see why it is happening.
Regards,
Nithya
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 20:25, Artem Russakovskii <archon810 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> The flood is indeed fixed for us on 5.5. However, the crashes are not.
>
> Sincerely,
> Artem
>
> --
> Founder, Android Police <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK Mirror
> <http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC
> beerpla.net | +ArtemRussakovskii
> <https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii> | @ArtemR
> <http://twitter.com/ArtemR>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:41 AM Hu Bert <revirii at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Amar,
>>
>> if you refer to this bug:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674225 : in the test
>> setup i haven't seen those entries, while copying & deleting a few GBs
>> of data. For a final statement we have to wait until i updated our
>> live gluster servers - could take place on tuesday or wednesday.
>>
>> Maybe other users can do an update to 5.4 as well and report back here.
>>
>>
>> Hubert
>>
>>
>>
>> Am Mo., 18. März 2019 um 11:36 Uhr schrieb Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan
>> <atumball at redhat.com>:
>> >
>> > Hi Hu Bert,
>> >
>> > Appreciate the feedback. Also are the other boiling issues related to
>> logs fixed now?
>> >
>> > -Amar
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 3:54 PM Hu Bert <revirii at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> update: upgrade from 5.3 -> 5.5 in a replicate 3 test setup with 2
>> >> volumes done. In 'gluster peer status' the peers stay connected during
>> >> the upgrade, no 'peer rejected' messages. No cksum mismatches in the
>> >> logs. Looks good :-)
>> >>
>> >> Am Mo., 18. März 2019 um 09:54 Uhr schrieb Hu Bert <
>> revirii at googlemail.com>:
>> >> >
>> >> > Good morning :-)
>> >> >
>> >> > for debian the packages are there:
>> >> >
>> https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/5.5/Debian/stretch/amd64/apt/pool/main/g/glusterfs/
>> >> >
>> >> > I'll do an upgrade of a test installation 5.3 -> 5.5 and see if there
>> >> > are some errors etc. and report back.
>> >> >
>> >> > btw: no release notes for 5.4 and 5.5 so far?
>> >> > https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/release-notes/ ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Am Fr., 15. März 2019 um 14:28 Uhr schrieb Shyam Ranganathan
>> >> > <srangana at redhat.com>:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > We created a 5.5 release tag, and it is under packaging now. It
>> should
>> >> > > be packaged and ready for testing early next week and should be
>> released
>> >> > > close to mid-week next week.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Thanks,
>> >> > > Shyam
>> >> > > On 3/13/19 12:34 PM, Artem Russakovskii wrote:
>> >> > > > Wednesday now with no update :-/
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Sincerely,
>> >> > > > Artem
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > --
>> >> > > > Founder, Android Police <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK
>> Mirror
>> >> > > > <http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC
>> >> > > > beerpla.net <http://beerpla.net/> | +ArtemRussakovskii
>> >> > > > <https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii> | @ArtemR
>> >> > > > <http://twitter.com/ArtemR>
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:28 AM Artem Russakovskii <
>> archon810 at gmail.com
>> >> > > > <mailto:archon810 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Hi Amar,
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Any updates on this? I'm still not seeing it in OpenSUSE
>> build
>> >> > > > repos. Maybe later today?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Thanks.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Sincerely,
>> >> > > > Artem
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > --
>> >> > > > Founder, Android Police <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK
>> Mirror
>> >> > > > <http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC
>> >> > > > beerpla.net <http://beerpla.net/> | +ArtemRussakovskii
>> >> > > > <https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii> | @ArtemR
>> >> > > > <http://twitter.com/ArtemR>
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 10:30 PM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan
>> >> > > > <atumball at redhat.com <mailto:atumball at redhat.com>> wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > We are talking days. Not weeks. Considering already it is
>> >> > > > Thursday here. 1 more day for tagging, and packaging.
>> May be ok
>> >> > > > to expect it on Monday.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > -Amar
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:54 AM Artem Russakovskii
>> >> > > > <archon810 at gmail.com <mailto:archon810 at gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Is the next release going to be an imminent hotfix,
>> i.e.
>> >> > > > something like today/tomorrow, or are we talking
>> weeks?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Sincerely,
>> >> > > > Artem
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > --
>> >> > > > Founder, Android Police <
>> http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK
>> >> > > > Mirror <http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot
>> LLC
>> >> > > > beerpla.net <http://beerpla.net/> |
>> +ArtemRussakovskii
>> >> > > > <https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii> |
>> @ArtemR
>> >> > > > <http://twitter.com/ArtemR>
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:09 AM Artem Russakovskii
>> >> > > > <archon810 at gmail.com <mailto:archon810 at gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Ended up downgrading to 5.3 just in case. Peer
>> status
>> >> > > > and volume status are OK now.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > zypper install --oldpackage
>> glusterfs-5.3-lp150.100.1
>> >> > > > Loading repository data...
>> >> > > > Reading installed packages...
>> >> > > > Resolving package dependencies...
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Problem: glusterfs-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64
>> requires
>> >> > > > libgfapi0 = 5.3, but this requirement cannot be
>> provided
>> >> > > > not installable providers:
>> >> > > > libgfapi0-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64[glusterfs]
>> >> > > > Solution 1: Following actions will be done:
>> >> > > > downgrade of libgfapi0-5.4-lp150.100.1.x86_64
>> to
>> >> > > > libgfapi0-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64
>> >> > > > downgrade of
>> libgfchangelog0-5.4-lp150.100.1.x86_64 to
>> >> > > > libgfchangelog0-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64
>> >> > > > downgrade of libgfrpc0-5.4-lp150.100.1.x86_64
>> to
>> >> > > > libgfrpc0-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64
>> >> > > > downgrade of libgfxdr0-5.4-lp150.100.1.x86_64
>> to
>> >> > > > libgfxdr0-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64
>> >> > > > downgrade of
>> libglusterfs0-5.4-lp150.100.1.x86_64 to
>> >> > > > libglusterfs0-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64
>> >> > > > Solution 2: do not install
>> glusterfs-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64
>> >> > > > Solution 3: break
>> glusterfs-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64 by
>> >> > > > ignoring some of its dependencies
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Choose from above solutions by number or cancel
>> >> > > > [1/2/3/c] (c): 1
>> >> > > > Resolving dependencies...
>> >> > > > Resolving package dependencies...
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > The following 6 packages are going to be
>> downgraded:
>> >> > > > glusterfs libgfapi0 libgfchangelog0 libgfrpc0
>> >> > > > libgfxdr0 libglusterfs0
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > 6 packages to downgrade.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Sincerely,
>> >> > > > Artem
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > --
>> >> > > > Founder, Android Police
>> >> > > > <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK Mirror
>> >> > > > <http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC
>> >> > > > beerpla.net <http://beerpla.net/> |
>> +ArtemRussakovskii
>> >> > > > <https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii> |
>> @ArtemR
>> >> > > > <http://twitter.com/ArtemR>
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:57 AM Artem
>> Russakovskii
>> >> > > > <archon810 at gmail.com <mailto:archon810 at gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Noticed the same when upgrading from 5.3 to
>> 5.4, as
>> >> > > > mentioned.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > I'm confused though. Is actual replication
>> affected,
>> >> > > > because the 5.4 server and the 3x 5.3
>> servers still
>> >> > > > show heal info as all 4 connected, and the
>> files
>> >> > > > seem to be replicating correctly as well.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > So what's actually affected - just the status
>> >> > > > command, or leaving 5.4 on one of the nodes
>> is doing
>> >> > > > some damage to the underlying fs? Is it
>> fixable by
>> >> > > > tweaking transport.socket.ssl-enabled? Does
>> >> > > > upgrading all servers to 5.4 resolve it, or
>> should
>> >> > > > we revert back to 5.3?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Sincerely,
>> >> > > > Artem
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > --
>> >> > > > Founder, Android Police
>> >> > > > <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK Mirror
>> >> > > > <http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical
>> Robot LLC
>> >> > > > beerpla.net <http://beerpla.net/> |
>> >> > > > +ArtemRussakovskii
>> >> > > > <https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii>
>> >> > > > | @ArtemR <http://twitter.com/ArtemR>
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 2:02 AM Hu Bert
>> >> > > > <revirii at googlemail.com
>> >> > > > <mailto:revirii at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > fyi: did a downgrade 5.4 -> 5.3 and it
>> worked.
>> >> > > > all replicas are up and
>> >> > > > running. Awaiting updated v5.4.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > thx :-)
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Am Di., 5. März 2019 um 09:26 Uhr
>> schrieb Hari
>> >> > > > Gowtham <hgowtham at redhat.com
>> >> > > > <mailto:hgowtham at redhat.com>>:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > There are plans to revert the patch
>> causing
>> >> > > > this error and rebuilt 5.4.
>> >> > > > > This should happen faster. the rebuilt
>> 5.4
>> >> > > > should be void of this upgrade issue.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > In the meantime, you can use 5.3 for
>> this cluster.
>> >> > > > > Downgrading to 5.3 will work if it was
>> just
>> >> > > > one node that was upgrade to 5.4
>> >> > > > > and the other nodes are still in 5.3.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 1:07 PM Hu Bert
>> >> > > > <revirii at googlemail.com
>> >> > > > <mailto:revirii at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Hi Hari,
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > thx for the hint. Do you know when
>> this will
>> >> > > > be fixed? Is a downgrade
>> >> > > > > > 5.4 -> 5.3 a possibility to fix this?
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Hubert
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Am Di., 5. März 2019 um 08:32 Uhr
>> schrieb
>> >> > > > Hari Gowtham <hgowtham at redhat.com
>> >> > > > <mailto:hgowtham at redhat.com>>:
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > Hi,
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > This is a known issue we are
>> working on.
>> >> > > > > > > As the checksum differs between the
>> >> > > > updated and non updated node, the
>> >> > > > > > > peers are getting rejected.
>> >> > > > > > > The bricks aren't coming because
>> of the
>> >> > > > same issue.
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > More about the issue:
>> >> > > >
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685120
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:56 PM Hu
>> Bert
>> >> > > > <revirii at googlemail.com
>> >> > > > <mailto:revirii at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > Interestingly: gluster volume
>> status
>> >> > > > misses gluster1, while heal
>> >> > > > > > > > statistics show gluster1:
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > gluster volume status workdata
>> >> > > > > > > > Status of volume: workdata
>> >> > > > > > > > Gluster process
>> >> > > > TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > > > > > > > Brick
>> gluster2:/gluster/md4/workdata
>> >> > > > 49153 0 Y 1723
>> >> > > > > > > > Brick
>> gluster3:/gluster/md4/workdata
>> >> > > > 49153 0 Y 2068
>> >> > > > > > > > Self-heal Daemon on localhost
>> >> > > > N/A N/A Y 1732
>> >> > > > > > > > Self-heal Daemon on gluster3
>> >> > > > N/A N/A Y 2077
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > vs.
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > gluster volume heal workdata
>> statistics
>> >> > > > heal-count
>> >> > > > > > > > Gathering count of entries to be
>> healed
>> >> > > > on volume workdata has been successful
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > Brick
>> gluster1:/gluster/md4/workdata
>> >> > > > > > > > Number of entries: 0
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > Brick
>> gluster2:/gluster/md4/workdata
>> >> > > > > > > > Number of entries: 10745
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > Brick
>> gluster3:/gluster/md4/workdata
>> >> > > > > > > > Number of entries: 10744
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > Am Di., 5. März 2019 um 08:18 Uhr
>> >> > > > schrieb Hu Bert <revirii at googlemail.com
>> >> > > > <mailto:revirii at googlemail.com>>:
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > Hi Miling,
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > well, there are such entries,
>> but
>> >> > > > those haven't been a problem during
>> >> > > > > > > > > install and the last kernel
>> >> > > > update+reboot. The entries look like:
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > PUBLIC_IP
>> gluster2.alpserver.de
>> >> > > > <http://gluster2.alpserver.de> gluster2
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > 192.168.0.50 gluster1
>> >> > > > > > > > > 192.168.0.51 gluster2
>> >> > > > > > > > > 192.168.0.52 gluster3
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > 'ping gluster2' resolves to
>> LAN IP; I
>> >> > > > removed the last entry in the
>> >> > > > > > > > > 1st line, did a reboot ... no,
>> didn't
>> >> > > > help. From
>> >> > > > > > > > > /var/log/glusterfs/glusterd.log
>> >> > > > > > > > > on gluster 2:
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > [2019-03-05 07:04:36.188128] E
>> [MSGID:
>> >> > > > 106010]
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> [glusterd-utils.c:3483:glusterd_compare_friend_volume]
>> >> > > > 0-management:
>> >> > > > > > > > > Version of Cksums persistent
>> differ.
>> >> > > > local cksum = 3950307018, remote
>> >> > > > > > > > > cksum = 455409345 on peer
>> gluster1
>> >> > > > > > > > > [2019-03-05 07:04:36.188314] I
>> [MSGID:
>> >> > > > 106493]
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> [glusterd-handler.c:3843:glusterd_xfer_friend_add_resp]
>> >> > > > 0-glusterd:
>> >> > > > > > > > > Responded to gluster1 (0),
>> ret: 0,
>> >> > > > op_ret: -1
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > Interestingly there are no
>> entries in
>> >> > > > the brick logs of the rejected
>> >> > > > > > > > > server. Well, not surprising
>> as no
>> >> > > > brick process is running. The
>> >> > > > > > > > > server gluster1 is still in
>> rejected
>> >> > > > state.
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > 'gluster volume start workdata
>> force'
>> >> > > > starts the brick process on
>> >> > > > > > > > > gluster1, and some heals are
>> happening
>> >> > > > on gluster2+3, but via 'gluster
>> >> > > > > > > > > volume status workdata' the
>> volumes
>> >> > > > still aren't complete.
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > gluster1:
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > > > > > > > > Brick
>> gluster1:/gluster/md4/workdata
>> >> > > > 49152 0 Y 2523
>> >> > > > > > > > > Self-heal Daemon on localhost
>> >> > > > N/A N/A Y 2549
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > gluster2:
>> >> > > > > > > > > Gluster process
>> >> > > > TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > > > > > > > > Brick
>> gluster2:/gluster/md4/workdata
>> >> > > > 49153 0 Y 1723
>> >> > > > > > > > > Brick
>> gluster3:/gluster/md4/workdata
>> >> > > > 49153 0 Y 2068
>> >> > > > > > > > > Self-heal Daemon on localhost
>> >> > > > N/A N/A Y 1732
>> >> > > > > > > > > Self-heal Daemon on gluster3
>> >> > > > N/A N/A Y 2077
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > Hubert
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > Am Di., 5. März 2019 um 07:58
>> Uhr
>> >> > > > schrieb Milind Changire <
>> mchangir at redhat.com
>> >> > > > <mailto:mchangir at redhat.com>>:
>> >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > > There are probably DNS
>> entries or
>> >> > > > /etc/hosts entries with the public IP
>> Addresses
>> >> > > > that the host names (gluster1, gluster2,
>> >> > > > gluster3) are getting resolved to.
>> >> > > > > > > > > > /etc/resolv.conf would tell
>> which is
>> >> > > > the default domain searched for the node
>> names
>> >> > > > and the DNS servers which respond to the
>> queries.
>> >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:14
>> PM Hu
>> >> > > > Bert <revirii at googlemail.com
>> >> > > > <mailto:revirii at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Good morning,
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> i have a replicate 3 setup
>> with 2
>> >> > > > volumes, running on version 5.3 on
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> debian stretch. This
>> morning i
>> >> > > > upgraded one server to version 5.4 and
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> rebooted the machine; after
>> the
>> >> > > > restart i noticed that:
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> - no brick process is
>> running
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> - gluster volume status
>> only shows
>> >> > > > the server itself:
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> gluster volume status
>> workdata
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Status of volume: workdata
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Gluster process
>> >> > > > TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Brick
>> >> > > > gluster1:/gluster/md4/workdata N/A
>> >> > > > N/A N N/A
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> NFS Server on localhost
>> >> > > > N/A N/A N N/A
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> - gluster peer status on
>> the server
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> gluster peer status
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Number of Peers: 2
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Hostname: gluster3
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Uuid:
>> >> > > > c7b4a448-ca6a-4051-877f-788f9ee9bc4a
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> State: Peer Rejected
>> (Connected)
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Hostname: gluster2
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Uuid:
>> >> > > > 162fea82-406a-4f51-81a3-e90235d8da27
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> State: Peer Rejected
>> (Connected)
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> - gluster peer status on
>> the other
>> >> > > > 2 servers:
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> gluster peer status
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Number of Peers: 2
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Hostname: gluster1
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Uuid:
>> >> > > > 9a360776-7b58-49ae-831e-a0ce4e4afbef
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> State: Peer Rejected
>> (Connected)
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Hostname: gluster3
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Uuid:
>> >> > > > c7b4a448-ca6a-4051-877f-788f9ee9bc4a
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> State: Peer in Cluster
>> (Connected)
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> I noticed that, in the
>> brick logs,
>> >> > > > i see that the public IP is used
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> instead of the LAN IP.
>> brick logs
>> >> > > > from one of the volumes:
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> rejected node:
>> >> > > > https://pastebin.com/qkpj10Sd
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> connected nodes:
>> >> > > > https://pastebin.com/8SxVVYFV
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Why is the public IP
>> suddenly used
>> >> > > > instead of the LAN IP? Killing all
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> gluster processes and
>> rebooting
>> >> > > > (again) didn't help.
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Thx,
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Hubert
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > >
>> _______________________________________________
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Gluster-users mailing list
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> >> > > > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > >
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>> >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > > --
>> >> > > > > > > > > > Milind
>> >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> _______________________________________________
>> >> > > > > > > > Gluster-users mailing list
>> >> > > > > > > > Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> >> > > > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > --
>> >> > > > > > > Regards,
>> >> > > > > > > Hari Gowtham.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > --
>> >> > > > > Regards,
>> >> > > > > Hari Gowtham.
>> >> > > >
>> _______________________________________________
>> >> > > > Gluster-users mailing list
>> >> > > > Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> >> > > > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>> >> > > >
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > _______________________________________________
>> >> > > > Gluster-users mailing list
>> >> > > > Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>> >> > > >
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > --
>> >> > > > Amar Tumballi (amarts)
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > _______________________________________________
>> >> > > > Gluster-users mailing list
>> >> > > > Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> >> > > > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > _______________________________________________
>> >> > > Gluster-users mailing list
>> >> > > Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> >> > > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Amar Tumballi (amarts)
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190320/35de76b6/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list