[Gluster-users] Gluster and bonding
dm at belkam.com
Mon Feb 25 04:41:38 UTC 2019
23.02.2019 19:54, Alex K пишет:
> Hi all,
> I have a replica 3 setup where each server was configured with a dual
> interfaces in mode 6 bonding. All cables were connected to one common
> network switch.
> To add redundancy to the switch, and avoid being a single point of
> failure, I connected each second cable of each server to a second
> switch. This turned out to not function as gluster was refusing to
> start the volume logging "transport endpoint is disconnected" although
> all nodes were able to reach each other (ping) in the storage network.
> I switched the mode to mode 1 (active/passive) and initially it worked
> but following a reboot of all cluster same issue appeared. Gluster is
> not starting the volumes.
> Isn't active/passive supposed to work like that? Can one have such
> redundant network setup or are there any other recommended approaches?
Yes, we use lacp, I guess this is mode 4 ( we use teamd ), it is, no
doubt, best way.
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gluster-users