[gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.12.3 released

[Niels de Vos]

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:38:32AM +0530, Aravinda wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 November 2017 08:29 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:06:59AM +0530, Aravinda wrote:
> > > Hi Niels,
> > > 
> > > I over looked the email about 3.12.3 release.
> > > 
> > > Please suggest what we can do for this package dependency. This is runtime
> > > dependency for one of the sub feature, if it is delaying other things then
> > > we can remove this dependency from spec file.(All features work except
> > > signing the webhook data).
> > Hmm, normally new features do not get backported to prevent unforseen
> > problems...
> > 
> > We have been delayed quite a bit already, users are asking for the
> > packages. If dropping the dependency from the .spec does not result in
> > errors or tracebacks, that would be one approach. Can you please confirm
> > that there are no problems when the package is missing?
> Without the dependency, BZ 1501864 will not work. I will start working on
> the alternate approach without using that library. We can remove from
> dependency list now.
> 
> @Sahina, Is it possible to wait for this feature till 3.12.4 release?

Many thanks Aravinda! I've spoken with Jiffin (one of the 3.12 release
managers) about this as well now. I will revert the change in the
packaging for the CentOS Storage SIG, both the code and the dependency.

If a good alternative comes up, and the feature is critical to be in
3.12, we can do an update of the RPMs or wait for 3.12.4+.

Niels


> > If there is, we'll just bite the bullet and include python-jws-1.5 in
> > the CentOS Storage SIG while keeping an eye on the Fedora package for
> > updates. Additional maintainers for this and other packages are much
> > wanted.
> > 
> > Niels
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Monday 20 November 2017 09:59 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > > > Hi Aravinda,
> > > > 
> > > > A reply on the questions below is still outstanding. At the moment, I
> > > > tend to think that using the most recent python-jwt package from Fedora
> > > > is the most reasonable approach. It is a little more maintained there,
> > > > and the CentOS Storage SIG can then piggy-back on the coming bugfixes
> > > > and updates.
> > > > 
> > > > Is there someone who wants to maintain/assist with watching over
> > > > python-jwt for the CentOS Storage SIG?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Niels
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:22:52PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:39:46AM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org wrote:
> > > > > > SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.tar.gz
> > > > > > HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.sha256sum
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This release is made off jenkins-release-21
> > > > > This release adds an additional dependency for the glusterfs-events
> > > > > sub-package (https://review.gluster.org/18519). There is no python-jwt
> > > > > in RHEL/CentOS-7 so, we'll need to ship (and maintain!) this new package
> > > > > in the CentOS Storage SIG.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Will python-jwt become part of RHEL at one point? Which version will be
> > > > > included in that case? I would prefer not to have to maintain python-jwt
> > > > > longer than necessary, and when RHEL-7 ships this package, it should
> > > > > ideally update the version I need to add to the Storage SIG.
> > > > > 
> > > > > [Obviously this delays packaging the update for CentOS.]
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Niels
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > packaging mailing list
> > > > > packaging at gluster.org
> > > > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > regards
> > > Aravinda VK
> > > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> regards
> Aravinda VK
>