[gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.12.3 released

[Sahina Bose]

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:38:32AM +0530, Aravinda wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 November 2017 08:29 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:06:59AM +0530, Aravinda wrote:
> > > > Hi Niels,
> > > >
> > > > I over looked the email about 3.12.3 release.
> > > >
> > > > Please suggest what we can do for this package dependency. This is
> runtime
> > > > dependency for one of the sub feature, if it is delaying other
> things then
> > > > we can remove this dependency from spec file.(All features work
> except
> > > > signing the webhook data).
> > > Hmm, normally new features do not get backported to prevent unforseen
> > > problems...
> > >
> > > We have been delayed quite a bit already, users are asking for the
> > > packages. If dropping the dependency from the .spec does not result in
> > > errors or tracebacks, that would be one approach. Can you please
> confirm
> > > that there are no problems when the package is missing?
> > Without the dependency, BZ 1501864 will not work. I will start working on
> > the alternate approach without using that library. We can remove from
> > dependency list now.
> >
> > @Sahina, Is it possible to wait for this feature till 3.12.4 release?
>
> Many thanks Aravinda! I've spoken with Jiffin (one of the 3.12 release
> managers) about this as well now. I will revert the change in the
> packaging for the CentOS Storage SIG, both the code and the dependency.
>
> If a good alternative comes up, and the feature is critical to be in
> 3.12, we can do an update of the RPMs or wait for 3.12.4+.
>

We did have a dependency for the eventing integration feature slated for
oVirt 4.2 on BZ 1501864. We already missed the beta for oVirt 4.2, so if an
update of RPMs is possible that would be ideal.


> Niels
>
>
> > > If there is, we'll just bite the bullet and include python-jws-1.5 in
> > > the CentOS Storage SIG while keeping an eye on the Fedora package for
> > > updates. Additional maintainers for this and other packages are much
> > > wanted.
> > >
> > > Niels
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Monday 20 November 2017 09:59 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > > > > Hi Aravinda,
> > > > >
> > > > > A reply on the questions below is still outstanding. At the
> moment, I
> > > > > tend to think that using the most recent python-jwt package from
> Fedora
> > > > > is the most reasonable approach. It is a little more maintained
> there,
> > > > > and the CentOS Storage SIG can then piggy-back on the coming
> bugfixes
> > > > > and updates.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there someone who wants to maintain/assist with watching over
> > > > > python-jwt for the CentOS Storage SIG?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Niels
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:22:52PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:39:46AM +0000,
> jenkins at build.gluster.org wrote:
> > > > > > > SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/
> glusterfs-3.12.3.tar.gz
> > > > > > > HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/
> glusterfs-3.12.3.sha256sum
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This release is made off jenkins-release-21
> > > > > > This release adds an additional dependency for the
> glusterfs-events
> > > > > > sub-package (https://review.gluster.org/18519). There is no
> python-jwt
> > > > > > in RHEL/CentOS-7 so, we'll need to ship (and maintain!) this new
> package
> > > > > > in the CentOS Storage SIG.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Will python-jwt become part of RHEL at one point? Which version
> will be
> > > > > > included in that case? I would prefer not to have to maintain
> python-jwt
> > > > > > longer than necessary, and when RHEL-7 ships this package, it
> should
> > > > > > ideally update the version I need to add to the Storage SIG.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [Obviously this delays packaging the update for CentOS.]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Niels
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > packaging mailing list
> > > > > > packaging at gluster.org
> > > > > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > regards
> > > > Aravinda VK
> > > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > regards
> > Aravinda VK
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20171122/ca66823e/attachment-0001.html>