[gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.12.3 released

Aravinda avishwan at redhat.com
Wed Nov 22 05:08:32 UTC 2017

On Tuesday 21 November 2017 08:29 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:06:59AM +0530, Aravinda wrote:
>> Hi Niels,
>> I over looked the email about 3.12.3 release.
>> Please suggest what we can do for this package dependency. This is runtime
>> dependency for one of the sub feature, if it is delaying other things then
>> we can remove this dependency from spec file.(All features work except
>> signing the webhook data).
> Hmm, normally new features do not get backported to prevent unforseen
> problems...
> We have been delayed quite a bit already, users are asking for the
> packages. If dropping the dependency from the .spec does not result in
> errors or tracebacks, that would be one approach. Can you please confirm
> that there are no problems when the package is missing?
Without the dependency, BZ 1501864 will not work. I will start working 
on the alternate approach without using that library. We can remove from 
dependency list now.

@Sahina, Is it possible to wait for this feature till 3.12.4 release?

> If there is, we'll just bite the bullet and include python-jws-1.5 in
> the CentOS Storage SIG while keeping an eye on the Fedora package for
> updates. Additional maintainers for this and other packages are much
> wanted.
> Niels
>> On Monday 20 November 2017 09:59 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>> Hi Aravinda,
>>> A reply on the questions below is still outstanding. At the moment, I
>>> tend to think that using the most recent python-jwt package from Fedora
>>> is the most reasonable approach. It is a little more maintained there,
>>> and the CentOS Storage SIG can then piggy-back on the coming bugfixes
>>> and updates.
>>> Is there someone who wants to maintain/assist with watching over
>>> python-jwt for the CentOS Storage SIG?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Niels
>>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:22:52PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:39:46AM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org wrote:
>>>>> SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.tar.gz
>>>>> HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.sha256sum
>>>>> This release is made off jenkins-release-21
>>>> This release adds an additional dependency for the glusterfs-events
>>>> sub-package (https://review.gluster.org/18519). There is no python-jwt
>>>> in RHEL/CentOS-7 so, we'll need to ship (and maintain!) this new package
>>>> in the CentOS Storage SIG.
>>>> Will python-jwt become part of RHEL at one point? Which version will be
>>>> included in that case? I would prefer not to have to maintain python-jwt
>>>> longer than necessary, and when RHEL-7 ships this package, it should
>>>> ideally update the version I need to add to the Storage SIG.
>>>> [Obviously this delays packaging the update for CentOS.]
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Niels
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> packaging mailing list
>>>> packaging at gluster.org
>>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>> -- 
>> regards
>> Aravinda VK

Aravinda VK

More information about the packaging mailing list