[Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.4 released

[Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan]

We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout v5.4' points
to the correct commit?

On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan, <srangana at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Niels, Kaleb,
>
> We need to respin 5.4 with the 2 additional commits as follows,
>
> commit a00953ed212a7071b152c4afccd35b92fa5a682a (HEAD -> release-5,
>     core: make compute_cksum function op_version compatible
>
> commit 8fb4631c65f28dd0a5e0304386efff3c807e64a4
>     dict: handle STR_OLD data type in xdr conversions
>
> As the current build breaks rolling upgrades, we had held back on
> announcing 5.4 and are now ready with the fixes that can be used to
> respin 5.4.
>
> Let me know if I need to do anything more from my end for help with the
> packaging.
>
> Once the build is ready, we would be testing it out as usual.
>
> NOTE: As some users have picked up 5.4 the announce would also carry a
> notice, that they need to do a downserver upgrade to the latest bits
> owing to the patches that have landed in addition to the existing content.
>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
>
> On 3/5/19 8:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> > On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org
> wrote:
> >>> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
> >>> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
> >>
> >> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
> >> Please try them out and report test results on this list.
> >>
> >>   # yum install centos-release-gluster
> >>   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
> >
> > Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or revert
> > of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.
> >
> > The current RPMs should hence not be published.
> >
> > Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or
> > are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shyam
> >
> > [1] Patch causing regression:
> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148
> >
> > [2] Proposed fix on master:
> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/
> > _______________________________________________
> > maintainers mailing list
> > maintainers at gluster.org
> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20190313/6a35455a/attachment.html>