[Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Master branch lock down status

[Karthik Subrahmanya]

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 2:28 PM Nigel Babu <nigelb at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 2:00 PM Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 08/08/2018 05:07 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>> > 5) Current test failures
>> > We still have the following tests failing and some without any RCA or
>> > attention, (If something is incorrect, write back).
>> >
>> > ./tests/basic/afr/add-brick-self-heal.t (needs attention)
>>  From the runs captured at https://review.gluster.org/#/c/20637/ , I saw
>> that the latest runs where this particular .t failed were at
>> https://build.gluster.org/job/line-coverage/415 and
>> https://build.gluster.org/job/line-coverage/421/.
>> In both of these runs, there are no gluster 'regression' logs available
>> at https://build.gluster.org/job/line-coverage/<build-number>/artifact.
>> I have raised BZ 1613721 for it.
>
>
> We've fixed this for newer runs, but we can do nothing for older runs,
> sadly.
>
Thanks Nigel! I'm also blocked on this. The failures are not reproducible
locally.
Without the logs we can not debug the issue. Will wait for the new runs to
complete.

>
>
>>
>> Also, Shyam was saying that in case of retries, the old (failure) logs
>> get overwritten by the retries which are successful. Can we disable
>> re-trying the .ts when they fail just for this lock down period alone so
>> that we do have the logs?
>
>
> Please don't apply a band-aid. Please fix run-test.sh so that the second
> run has a -retry attached to the file name or some such, please.
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20180808/ff14ae5b/attachment.html>