[Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

[Shyam Ranganathan]

On 07/23/2017 01:01 PM, Amar Tumballi wrote:
> Responses inline.
> 
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Shyam <srangana at redhat.com 
> <mailto:srangana at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>     - posix: provide option to handle 'statfs()' properly when more than
>     1 brick is exported from 1 node
>        - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/241
>     <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/241>
>        - @amarts patch is still awaiting reviews, should this be tracked
>     as an exception?
> 
> Please consider it as an required bug fix. (This needn't have a release 
> note mention in features, but needs a mention in bugs section).

Ok, done. Should we close the github issue and open a bug report instead?

> 
> Also if I get the feature completed /reviewed this week in master, can 
> we get in fuse subdir mount  [11] patches backported? This will be by 
> default not available, and hence shouldn't be an issue IMO. More on it 
> is discussed in mailing-list [12]

Ok, added to the 3.12 scope, against exceptions for backports.

> 
> 
>     - Provide support for clearing translator specific inode contex /
>     forgetting inode (for supportability)
>        - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/249
>     <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/249>
> 
> Push out to 4.0

Already done.

> 
> 
>     - rpc-clnt reconnect timer
>        - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/152
>     <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/152>
> 
> Can be pushed to 4.0

Already done.

> 
>     - bug: read-only xlator doesn't implement fallocate
>        - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/187
>     <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/187>
> 
> Can we treat it as bug and take in a backport sometime before RC1?

Ok done. We possibly need to settle on bug vs issue on this as well (as 
the one above).

> 
> 
>     Thanking in advance for all the responses, so help cleanup and chase
>     the right reviews and features for the release.
> 
>     Shyam & Jiffin
> 
> Thanks for all the great work in summarising the tasks.
> 
> [11] - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/175
> [12] - 
> http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2017-July/053359.html
> 
>     [1] Review focus:
>     https://review.gluster.org/#/q/starredby:srangana%2540redhat.com
>     <https://review.gluster.org/#/q/starredby:srangana%2540redhat.com>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Amar Tumballi (amarts)