[Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

[Niels de Vos]

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 04:06:58PM -0400, Shyam wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Prepare for a lengthy mail, but needed for the 3.12 release branching, so
> here is a key to aid the impatient,
> 
> Key:
> 1) If you asked for an exception to a feature (meaning delayed backport to
> 3.12 branch post branching for the release) see "Section 1"
>   - Handy list of nick's that maybe interested in this:
>     - @pranithk, @sunilheggodu, @aspandey, @amarts, @kalebskeithley, @kshlm
> (IPv6), @jdarcy (Halo Hybrid)
> 
> 2) If you have/had a feature targeted for 3.12 and have some code posted
> against the same, look at "Section 2" AND we want to hear back from you!
>   - Handy list of nick's that should be interested in this:
>     - @csabahenk, @nixpanic, @aravindavk, @amarts, @kotreshhr, @soumyakoduri
> 
> 3) If you have/had a feature targeted for 3.12 and have posted no code
> against the same yet, see "Section 3", your feature is being dropped from
> the release.
>   - Handy list of nick's that maybe interested in this:
>     - @sanoj-unnikrishnan, @aravindavk, @kotreshhr, @amarts, @jdarcy, @avra
> (people who filed the issue)
> 
> 4) Finally, if you do not have any features for the release pending, please
> help others out reviewing what is still pending, here [1] is a quick link to
> those reviews.
> 
> Sections:

..

> ******Section 2:******
> Issues needing some further clarity: (Total: 6)
> Reason:
>   - There are issues here, for which code is already merged (or submitted)
> and issue is still open. This is the right state for an issue to be in this
> stage of the release, as documentation or release-notes would possibly be
> still pending, which will finally close the issue (or rather mark it fixed)
>   - BUT, without a call out from the contributors that required code is
> already merged in, it is difficult to assess if the issue should qualify for
> the release
> 
> Issue list:

..

> - Decide what to do with glfs_ipc() in libgfapi
>   - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/269
>   - @nixpanic I assume there is more than just test case disabling for this,
> is this expected to happen by 3.12?

https://review.gluster.org/17854 has been posted against the master
branch. Once it is merged, it should be backported to the release-3.12
branch. This also makes it unnecessary to revert/fixup the glfs_ipc()
function that has symbol version 4.0.

Thanks,
Niels
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20170724/cc71b528/attachment.sig>