[Gluster-users] glusterfs unusable?

[Marcelo Terres]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673058

Regards,

Marcelo H. Terres <mhterres at gmail.com>
https://www.mundoopensource.com.br
https://twitter.com/mhterres
https://linkedin.com/in/marceloterres


On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 14:32, richard lucassen <mailinglists at lucassen.org>
wrote:

> Hello list,
>
> glusterfs 5.4-1 on Debian Buster (both servers and clients)
>
> I'm quite new to GFS and it's an old problem I know. When running a
> simple "ls -alR" on a local directory containing 50MB and 3468 files it
> takes:
>
> real    0m0.567s
> user    0m0.084s
> sys     0m0.168s
>
> Same thing for a copy of that dir on GFS takes more than 5 seconds:
>
> real    0m5.557s
> user    0m0.128s
> sys     0m0.208s
>
> Ok. But from my workstation at home, an "ls -alR" of that directory
> takes more than half an hour and the upload is more than 2GB (no typo:
> TWO Gigabytes). To keep it simple, the ls of a few directories:
>
> $ time ls
> all  xabc-db  xabc-dc1  xabc-gluster  xabc-mail  xabc-otp  xabc-smtp
>
> real    0m5.766s
> user    0m0.001s
> sys     0m0.003s
>
> it receives 56kB and sends 2.3 MB for a simple ls.
>
> This is weird isn't it? Why this huge upload?
>
> Changing these options mentioned here doesn't make any difference:
>
> https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2016-January/024865.html
>
> Anyone a hint? Or should I drop GFS? This is unusable IMHO.
>
> Richard.
>
> --
> richard lucassen
> http://contact.xaq.nl/
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190327/48eee23e/attachment.html>