[Gluster-users] Very slow rsync to gluster volume UNLESS `ls` or `find` scan dir on gluster volume first
Amar Tumballi
atumball at redhat.com
Mon Feb 5 02:44:12 UTC 2018
Thanks for the report Artem,
Looks like the issue is about cache warming up. Specially, I suspect rsync
doing a 'readdir(), stat(), file operations' loop, where as when a find or
ls is issued, we get 'readdirp()' request, which contains the stat
information along with entries, which also makes sure cache is up-to-date
(at md-cache layer).
Note that this is just a off-the memory hypothesis, We surely need to
analyse and debug more thoroughly for a proper explanation. Some one in my
team would look at it soon.
Regards,
Amar
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Vlad Kopylov <vladkopy at gmail.com> wrote:
> You mounting it to the local bricks?
>
> struggling with same performance issues
> try using this volume setting
> http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2018-January/033397.html
> performance.stat-prefetch: on might be it
>
> seems like when it gets to cache it is fast - those stat fetch which
> seem to come from .gluster are slow
>
> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 3:45 AM, Artem Russakovskii <archon810 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > An update, and a very interesting one!
> >
> > After I started stracing rsync, all I could see was lstat calls, quite
> slow
> > ones, over and over, which is expected.
> >
> > For example: lstat("uploads/2016/10/nexus2cee_DSC05339_thumb-
> 161x107.jpg",
> > {st_mode=S_IFREG|0664, st_size=4043, ...}) = 0
> >
> > I googled around and found
> > https://gist.github.com/nh2/1836415489e2132cf85ed3832105fcc1, which is
> > seeing this exact issue with gluster, rsync and xfs.
> >
> > Here's the craziest finding so far. If while rsync is running (or right
> > before), I run /bin/ls or find on the same gluster dirs, it immediately
> > speeds up rsync by a factor of 100 or maybe even 1000. It's absolutely
> > insane.
> >
> > I'm stracing the rsync run, and the slow lstat calls flood in at an
> > incredible speed as soon as ls or find run. Several hundred of files per
> > minute (excruciatingly slow) becomes thousands or even tens of thousands
> of
> > files a second.
> >
> > What do you make of this?
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
--
Amar Tumballi (amarts)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180205/206efebb/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list