[Gluster-users] Migration path from native Gluster-NFS towards NFS-Ganesha

[Gambit15]

Why are you using NFS for using Gluster with oVirt? oVirt is natively able
to mount Gluster volumes via FUSE, which is *far* more efficient!

Doug

On 12 January 2017 at 18:36, Giuseppe Ragusa <giuseppe.ragusa at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> In light of the future removal of native Gluster-NFS (and also because of
> a worrying bug that causes NFS crashes, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
> show_bug.cgi?id=1381970 then http://www.gluster.org/
> pipermail/gluster-users/2016-November/029333.html and recently
> http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-January/029632.html )
> I'm planning to move towards NFS-Ganesha.
>
> I have a couple of questions for which I could not find answers on the
> available docs (sorry if I missed something):
>
> 1) Is it possible (and advisable, in production too) today (3.8.x) to
> configure a GlusterFS based cluster to use NFS-Ganesha (as NFS v3/v4
> solution) and Samba (as CIFS solution) both controlled by CTDB as a highly
> available *and* load balanced (multiple IPs with DNS round-robin, not
> active/passive) storage solution? (note: I mean *without* using a full
> Pacemaker+Corosync stack)
>
> 2) If the answer to the above question is "yes", is the above above
> mentioned solution capable of coexisting with oVirt in an hyperconverged
> setup (assuming replica 3 etc. etc.)?
>
> Many thanks in advance to anyone who can answer the above and/or point me
> to any relevant resources/docs.
>
> Best regards,
> Giuseppe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170116/da42cfb8/attachment.html>