[Gluster-users] Quick performance check?

Momonth momonth at gmail.com
Fri Feb 3 18:20:18 UTC 2017

I've tested the worst case scenario on purpose, by increasing number
of threads it was able to get more throughout, but it didn't change

Thanks for the links =)

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Gambit15 <dougti+gluster at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3 February 2017 at 11:09, Momonth <momonth at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I ran some benchmarking on SSD enabled servers, 10Gb connected, see
>> the file attached.
>> I'm still looking at GlusterFS as a persistent storage for containers,
>> and it's clear it's not going to compete with local file system
>> performance.
> Well that's kind of a given, with the standard rep 3, you're doing a sort of
> RAID 5 across the network. However depending on your use case & setup, you
> can get performance boosts akin to RAID 10 setups, multiplied bu the number
> of nodes/bricks in the cluster.
> http://blog.gluster.org/category/performance/
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/aws001/guided_trek/Performance_in_a_Gluster_Systemv6F.pdf
> I couldn't find the particular doc, but I've seen some ludicrous throughputs
> from configs using multiple nodes running SSDs in RAID 10 and peering over
> Infiband.
> D

More information about the Gluster-users mailing list