[Gluster-users] Quick performance check?

Momonth momonth at gmail.com
Fri Feb 3 18:20:18 UTC 2017


I've tested the worst case scenario on purpose, by increasing number
of threads it was able to get more throughout, but it didn't change
linearly.

Thanks for the links =)

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Gambit15 <dougti+gluster at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3 February 2017 at 11:09, Momonth <momonth at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I ran some benchmarking on SSD enabled servers, 10Gb connected, see
>> the file attached.
>>
>> I'm still looking at GlusterFS as a persistent storage for containers,
>> and it's clear it's not going to compete with local file system
>> performance.
>
>
> Well that's kind of a given, with the standard rep 3, you're doing a sort of
> RAID 5 across the network. However depending on your use case & setup, you
> can get performance boosts akin to RAID 10 setups, multiplied bu the number
> of nodes/bricks in the cluster.
>
> http://blog.gluster.org/category/performance/
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/aws001/guided_trek/Performance_in_a_Gluster_Systemv6F.pdf
>
> I couldn't find the particular doc, but I've seen some ludicrous throughputs
> from configs using multiple nodes running SSDs in RAID 10 and peering over
> Infiband.
>
> D
>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list