[Gluster-users] Cache performance degrades over time
Matt
matt at mattlantis.com
Tue Oct 18 18:20:32 UTC 2016
Hello list,
I have about a half a dozen nginx servers sitting in front of Gluster
(3.4.6, I know it's old) serving a mix videos and images. It's a
moderate amount of traffic, each of two geo-repped sites will do 2-4
gigs/second throughout the day.
Here's the problem. Reads from gluster, due to the way nginx buffers
the video, can far exceed what's being served out to the internet.
Serving 1 gig of video may read 3 gigs from Gluster.
I can fix this by setting the performance cache on the volume to a
pretty large size, right now it's at 2 gigs. This works great, gluster
uses 1.5 - 2 gigs of RAM and the in/out bandwidth on the nginx machines
becomes a healthy 1:1 or better.
For a few days. Over time, as the machines vfs cache fills, gluster
starts to use less RAM, and that ratio gets worse. Rebooting the nginx
boxes (or I presume, simply dropping their caches) fixes it immediately.
I'm going to try increasing vfs.cache_pressure on the nginx boxes, as
this doc recommends:
https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Linux%20Kernel%20Tuning/#vmvfs95cache95pressure
Does that make sense to tune this on the clients? Is Gluster competing
with the kernel cache? That's sort of my understanding but I can't find
a clear explanation.
Other recommendations would be welcome, though tweaking the direct-io
options is unfortunately not an option in my setup.
-Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20161018/5f30cc76/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list