[Gluster-users] [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Questions on ganesha HA and shared storage size

Malahal Naineni malahal at us.ibm.com
Mon Jun 15 21:30:02 UTC 2015

Alessandro De Salvo [Alessandro.DeSalvo at roma1.infn.it] wrote:
> OK, I think we are now closer to the end of the story.
> Recompiling with your instructions, and slightly changing the release name to match the convention in epel, the new RPMS produce something working!
> So it means essentially that:
> 1) the RPMS in epel are broken, they should really be fixed;
> 2) the RPMS, produced by exporting the tarball from git, even by selecting the correct branch, and the spec file from epel are broken as well;

What does this mean? Just the spec file in epel is broken.

> 3) following your procedure produce working packages, but with revision “0.3” instead of the required “3” (not a real problem, easy to fix).

Yeah, it produces 2.2.0-0.3 instead of 2.2.0-3 that we wanted. A patch
is welcome to fix this!

What you have just tested is the latest V2.2-stable which is 2.2.0-3.
The epel code is probably from V2.2.0 code. So either EPEL has a broken
spec file or V2.2.0 is broken. Can someone from redhat figure this out
and fix epel repo please.

Regards, Malahal.

More information about the Gluster-users mailing list