[Gluster-users] geo-replication master is distributed-replicated, slave is distributed only?

[M S Vishwanath Bhat]

On 21 August 2015 at 23:46, Christian Rice <crice at pandora.com> wrote:

> I’d like to have a distributed-replicated master volume, and
> distributed-only slave.
>
> Can this be done?  Just beginning the research, but so far I’ve only done
> geo-replication with distributed-only volumes.  Tips/caveats on this kind
> architecture are welcome.
>

Yes, This can be done. Both master and slave can be of different
configurations.

But make sure that your slave volume has more effective size available than
the master volume.

HTH

//MS


>
> The rationale is straightforward—the master volume should be able to stay
> available with all data when suffering a node loss, but the geo-replicated
> volumes can be taken offline for repairs and resync as soon as possible.
>
> Cheers,
> Christian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20150822/a3882a24/attachment.html>