[Gluster-users] Problem in Benchmarking Glusterfs with Bonnie++ on CentOS 6 machines

[Humble Devassy Chirammal]

Can you provide some more information about the setup .

What protocol ( fuse/nfs..etc) has been used here to mount the gluster
volume in your client ?

Are these bricks formatted with XFS ?

version of bonnie++ binary ?



--Humble


On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:59 AM, gauri Desai <gauridesai719 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello Vijay,
>
>  The following are the details:
>
> 1) glusterfs version:
>  3.6.1
>
> 2) Glusterfs volume info
>
> i have attached a screen shot
>
> 3) command used :
>
>  Bonnie++ -d /mnt/glusterfs/ -r 490 -u root
>
> 4)possible errors in glusterfs log files
>
> nothing noticeable in the log files but after running the bonnie command
> the following error message appears
>
> Stat files in sequential order.... Expected 16384 files but only got
> 163811 files.
> Cleaning up test directory after error.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/14/2014 11:13 PM, gauri Desai wrote:
>>
>>> Hello List,
>>>
>>>        I have set up a 4 node replicated distributed Filesystem using
>>> Glusterfs on centos 6 machines.
>>>
>>> I am trying to benchmark the glusterfs filesystem using Bonnie++, but as
>>> soon as i run bonnie++ on  the client after some time i get an error
>>> saying:
>>>
>>> Stat files in sequential order.... Expected 16384 files but only got
>>> 163811 files.
>>> Cleaning up test directory after error.
>>>
>>>
>>> The RAM size on my client is 490M and the mounted GlusterFS filessystem
>>> mounted on the client is 11G.
>>>
>>> Why might I be facing this issue? What can be a solution to this?
>>>
>>>
>> More details on your volume configuration (o/p of gluster volume info),
>> possible errors in glusterfs log files, glusterfs version, the exact
>> bonnie++ command line used etc. will help in narrowing down the problem.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vijay
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20141116/6ee9ec25/attachment.html>