[Gluster-users] Zero byte versions in DHT volume

Dan Bretherton dab at mail.nerc-essc.ac.uk
Wed Jun 9 11:40:17 UTC 2010


Dear Krishna and Vikas,

I see that perseus and romulus are remote-hosts in the subvolume, do
> they resolve to different servers or the same servers?
>
>
They resolve to different servers.

I have an idea what may have happened.  Some time ago I was experimenting
with a replicated DHT volume and ran into a "split brain" problem.  I didn't
have time to fix that problem so decided to rescue the data by copying the
data to its current location (a DHT volume) from the individual bricks of
the broken volume.  I used rsync with "--update" to ensure I was getting the
most recent version of each file.  It is possible that some of the files I
transferred were link files from the broken volume, and that these still
exist and are causing problems in the current DHT volume.

Can I fix this by deleting all link files in the current volume, brick by
brick?  I am hoping it will be possible to heal the volume in some way after
that, e.g. by doing ls -lR on all the clients.  I realise that some of the
rescued data might be missing because I ended up with link files instead of
real files.  That does not matter too much as the data is not crucial.
However I want to try to repair the current volume in order to gain
experience, before deploying Glusterfs more widely with more important data.

-Dan.

On 8 June 2010 20:00, <gluster-users-request at gluster.org> wrote:
Send Gluster-users mailing list submissions to
       gluster-users at gluster.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
       http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
       gluster-users-request at gluster.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
       gluster-users-owner at gluster.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gluster-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Zero byte versions in DHT volume (Krishna Srinivas)
  2. Re: Zero byte versions in DHT volume (Vikas Gorur)
  3. Re: Zero byte versions in DHT volume (Dan Bretherton)


------------------------------
>
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:40:02 -0700
>
> From: Krishna Srinivas <krishna at gluster.com>
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Zero byte versions in DHT volume
> To: Gluster General Discussion List <gluster-users at gluster.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <AANLkTimXqyqh2whouyF-88ydizDIQpUB7UM1Qs3HaWUd at mail.gmail.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Krishna Srinivas <krishna at gluster.com>
> wrote:
> > Dan,
> >
> > volume perseus
> > ? type protocol/client
> > ? option transport-type tcp
> > ? option remote-host perseus
> > ? option remote-port 6996
> > ? option remote-subvolume brick1
> > end-volume
> >
> > volume romulus
> > ? type protocol/client
> > ? option transport-type tcp
> > ? option remote-host romulus
> > ? option remote-port 6996
> > ? option remote-subvolume brick1
> > end-volume
> >
> > both volumes are pointing to brick1, hence the distribute sees the file
> twice.
>
> I see that perseus and romulus are remote-hosts in the subvolume, do
> they resolve to different servers or the same servers?
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:44:02 -0700
>
> From: Vikas Gorur <vikas at gluster.com>
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Zero byte versions in DHT volume
> To: Gluster General Discussion List <gluster-users at gluster.org>
> Message-ID: <2CB10C76-E1AB-4F6B-B92A-1DA162DEA15C at gluster.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:40 AM, Dan Bretherton wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I have found a large number of files like the one below in a DHT volume.
> >
> > ---------T  1 nobody nobody     0 2010-05-01 18:34 d80bao.daj0710
> >
> > For those I have checked, a real file (i.e. non-zero size and normal
> > permissions and ownership) exists on one brick and its zero byte
> counterpart
> > is on one of the other bricks. I originally found these files by looking
> in
> > the individual server bricks, but I discovered that I can also find them
> > using the "find" command in the glusterfs DHT volume itself.  However,
> > listing a directory containing these files with "ls" does not list the
> zero
> > byte versions, but instead two copies of the normal versions are shown.
> > Does anybody have an idea what is going on?  This strange behaviour is
> > clearly going to confuse some users, and there are sometimes also long
> > delays when listing the affected directories.  I am using GlusterFS
> version
> > 3.0.3 now but I also noticed this behaviour in 2.0.8.  My client and
> server
> > volume files are shown below.
>
> Dan, my apologies for not fully parsing your e-mail. The existence of link
> files is normal, but seeing them on the mountpoint or seeing duplicate files
> is not. This can usually happen due to mentioning the same subvolume twice,
> as Krishna suggested in the other e-mail.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Vikas Gorur
> Engineer - Gluster, Inc.
> ------------------------------
>


-- 
Mr. D.A. Bretherton
Reading e-Science Centre
Environmental Systems Science Centre
Harry Pitt Building
3 Earley Gate
University of Reading
Reading, RG6 6AL
UK

Tel. +44 118 378 7722
Fax: +44 118 378 6413


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list