[Gluster-infra] [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] Fwd: [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

sankarshan sankarshan at kadalu.io
Thu Dec 10 16:36:19 UTC 2020


What is your recommendation? As in, the next steps from here.

On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 21:28, Michael Scherer <mscherer at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Le jeudi 10 décembre 2020 à 21:14 +0530, sankarshan a écrit :
> > There are 2 specific bits which I expected to stimulate in discussion
> >
> > [1] a review by the Gluster Infrastructure team in terms of whether
> > there is any change in the processes/environment
>
> I was about to ask. For now, we run C8 almost nowhere, except 2
> builders.
>
> I pondered between switching both of them to C8s, or reinstall 2 on C8s
> and keep 2 on C8, to compare.
>
> I do not expect disruptive change on c8s that wouldn't already happen
> on c8 with a minor version, so I am ok to just switch, I just do not
> have any Centos 8 to test.
>
>
>
> > [2] whether the maintainers will consider reviewing this in entirety
> > and be able to assess the impact
> >
> > To my knowledge this topic was not previously brought up at any of
> > the
> > Gluster meetings, so it is worth requesting all parties involved to
> > take a moment to form their opinions and use appropriate forums to
> > discuss that.
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 14:04, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:00:35PM +0530, sankarshan wrote:
> > > > FYI. Would likely be important in context of packaging, testing
> > > > and
> > > > release content
> > >
> > > Indeed, we currently build packages in the CentOS Storage SIG
> > > against
> > > CentOS Linux, and not against CentOS Stream. But other than that, I
> > > do
> > > not expect major visible changes for our users.
> > >
> > > The main advantage is that we can more directly contribute to the
> > > distribution. CentOS Stream allows us to send PRs that get reviewed
> > > by
> > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux developers and potentially get
> > > included.  That
> > > means, enhancements to FUSE or other components do not need to rely
> > > on
> > > the work Red Hat is planning, but could be worked on by our
> > > community
> > > and get included earlier.
> > >
> > > If there are any concerns, I'd love to hear about it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Niels
> >
> >
> --
> Michael Scherer / He/Il/Er/Él
> Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure
>
>
>


-- 
sankarshan at kadalu.io | TZ: UTC+0530 | +91 99606 03294
kadalu.io : Making it easy to provision storage in k8s!


More information about the Gluster-infra mailing list