[Gluster-infra] qcow2 images / jenkins machines

[Dan Lambright]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Scherer" <mscherer at redhat.com>
> To: "Dan Lambright" <dlambrig at redhat.com>
> Cc: "gluster-infra" <gluster-infra at gluster.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 2:10:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-infra] qcow2 images / jenkins machines
> 
> Le mercredi 09 mars 2016 à 11:49 -0500, Dan Lambright a écrit :
> > I would like to load onto openstack qcow2 images and profiles most closely
> > resembling what we run in jenkins, to recreate problems seen in
> > regression.
> > 
> > What are the OS levels do we use on Jenkins for testing? I see:
> > 
> > netbsd7
> > 
> > centos6
> > 
> > fedora22
> > 
> > and "nbslave", RHEL7 ?
> > 
> > This is a very cursory look. How much memory and cores are these images
> > given?
> > 
> > If anyone knows the answer to these questions, response is appreciated.
> 
> so we have mostly centos 6 and netbsd 7, running on rackspace
> 
> The centos 6 are
> 2g of ram, 2 core
> model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz
> 
> Fedora 22 is just for smoke tests.
> Ther eis another Centos - who was here to validate the automated
> deployment, and a freebsd server for smoke test.
> 
> We do not use image based deployment, but mostly salt, using this
> states :
> https://github.com/gluster/gluster.org_salt_states/blob/master/jenkins/slave.sls
> 
> We will be converting this to ansible in the coming month, and
> Raghavendra Talur was working on a vagrant/ansible setup for testing too
> (hope we can unify both at some time in the future too)
> 
> No RHEL/Centos 7 yet, but we should.

I think RHEL/Centos7 would be a good thing from the point of view of testing.

> 
> --
> Michael Scherer
> Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS
> 
> 
>