[Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985
rgowdapp at redhat.com
Wed Aug 23 06:26:26 UTC 2017
Thanks Pranith and Ashish for your inputs.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com>
> To: "Ashish Pandey" <aspandey at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowdapp at redhat.com>, "Xavier Hernandez" <xhernandez at datalab.es>, "Gluster Devel"
> <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 11:55:19 AM
> Subject: Re: Need inputs on patch #17985
> As Ashish mentioned, there aren't any known problems if upper xlators
> don't send lookups in EC at the moment.
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Ashish Pandey <aspandey at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Raghvendra,
> > I have provided my comment on this patch.
> > I think EC will not have any issue with this approach.
> > However, I would welcome comments from Xavi and Pranith too for any side
> > effects which I may not be able to foresee.
> > Ashish
> > ------------------------------
> > *From: *"Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowdapp at redhat.com>
> > *To: *"Ashish Pandey" <aspandey at redhat.com>
> > *Cc: *"Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com>, "Xavier Hernandez"
> > <xhernandez at datalab.es>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> > *Sent: *Wednesday, August 23, 2017 8:29:48 AM
> > *Subject: *Need inputs on patch #17985
> > Hi Ashish,
> > Following are the blockers for making a decision on whether patch  can
> > be merged or not:
> > * Evaluation of dentry operations (like rename etc) in dht
> > * Whether EC works fine if a non-lookup fop (like open(dir), stat, chmod
> > etc) hits EC without a single lookup performed on file/inode
> > Can you please comment on the patch? I'll take care of dht part.
> >  https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17985/
> > regards,
> > Raghavendra
More information about the Gluster-devel