[Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

[Pranith Kumar Karampuri]

Raghavendra,
    As Ashish mentioned, there aren't any known problems if upper xlators
don't send lookups in EC at the moment.

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Ashish Pandey <aspandey at redhat.com> wrote:

> Raghvendra,
>
> I have provided my comment on this patch.
> I think EC will not have any issue with this approach.
> However, I would welcome comments from Xavi and Pranith too for any side
> effects which I may not be able to foresee.
>
> Ashish
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowdapp at redhat.com>
> *To: *"Ashish Pandey" <aspandey at redhat.com>
> *Cc: *"Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com>, "Xavier Hernandez"
> <xhernandez at datalab.es>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> *Sent: *Wednesday, August 23, 2017 8:29:48 AM
> *Subject: *Need inputs on patch #17985
>
>
> Hi Ashish,
>
> Following are the blockers for making a decision on whether patch [1] can
> be merged or not:
> * Evaluation of dentry operations (like rename etc) in dht
> * Whether EC works fine if a non-lookup fop (like open(dir), stat, chmod
> etc) hits EC without a single lookup performed on file/inode
>
> Can you please comment on the patch? I'll take care of dht part.
>
> [1] https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17985/
>
> regards,
> Raghavendra
>
>


-- 
Pranith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170823/09d0297b/attachment-0001.html>