[Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985
aspandey at redhat.com
Wed Aug 23 03:37:11 UTC 2017
I have provided my comment on this patch.
I think EC will not have any issue with this approach.
However, I would welcome comments from Xavi and Pranith too for any side effects which I may not be able to foresee.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowdapp at redhat.com>
To: "Ashish Pandey" <aspandey at redhat.com>
Cc: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com>, "Xavier Hernandez" <xhernandez at datalab.es>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 8:29:48 AM
Subject: Need inputs on patch #17985
Following are the blockers for making a decision on whether patch  can be merged or not:
* Evaluation of dentry operations (like rename etc) in dht
* Whether EC works fine if a non-lookup fop (like open(dir), stat, chmod etc) hits EC without a single lookup performed on file/inode
Can you please comment on the patch? I'll take care of dht part.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gluster-devel