[Gluster-devel] static analysis updated

Nigel Babu nigelb at redhat.com
Mon Dec 19 17:59:15 UTC 2016


On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:56:27PM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 12/19/2016 12:49 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation?
> >
> > The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of
> > them in the next 1 month, I can kick off a non-voting smoke job. We'll make it
> > vote after 1 month. I guess the cli and experimental xlator (and a few more
> > xlators, please check log) owners need to confirm that this is something we can
> > target to fix. And commit to keeping fixed.
>
> Hi,
>
> It would be great to fix those, but——
>
> IIRC we discussed a two compile before-and-after test, i.e. compile the
> tree before and after applying the patch. If the second compile has more
> (or different) warnings than the first, then the test scores a fail.
>
> If we do that we don't have to wait (as long) to make it a voting test.
>
> Once we have a voting test, then maintainers have not choice but to keep
> things fixed. ;-)
>

Ah, Prasanna has a patch to do that for clang. I can adopt that for this and
have both of them turned on. That might be a good New Year's welcome back :)

--
nigelb
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20161219/52cfd882/attachment.sig>


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list