[Gluster-devel] static analysis updated
Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
kkeithle at redhat.com
Mon Dec 19 17:58:55 UTC 2016
On 12/19/2016 12:56 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 12/19/2016 12:49 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
>> Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation?
>>
>> The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of
>> them in the next 1 month, I can kick off a non-voting smoke job. We'll make it
>> vote after 1 month. I guess the cli and experimental xlator (and a few more
>> xlators, please check log) owners need to confirm that this is something we can
>> target to fix. And commit to keeping fixed.
>
> Hi,
>
> It would be great to fix those, but——
>
> IIRC we discussed a two compile before-and-after test, i.e. compile the
> tree before and after applying the patch. If the second compile has more
> (or different) warnings than the first, then the test scores a fail.
>
> If we do that we don't have to wait (as long) to make it a voting test.
>
> Once we have a voting test, then maintainers have no choice but to keep
> things fixed. ;-)
And we can work on fixing the existing warnings in parallel.
--
Kaleb
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20161219/97cf332f/attachment.sig>
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list