[Gluster-devel] Moratorium on new patch acceptance

[Raghavendra Gowdappa]

Status on crash in dht_fsync reported by Vijay Bellur:

I am not able to reproduce the issue. However I am consistently hitting a failure in the last test of ./tests/performance/open-behind.t (test 18). The test reads as:


gluster volume top $V0 open | grep -w "$F0" >/dev/null 2>&1
TEST [ $? -eq 0 ];

"gluster volume top" is not giving file name in the output causing grep to fail resulting in failure of test.

regards,
Raghavendra.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vijaikumar M" <vmallika at redhat.com>
> To: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 4:43:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Moratorium on new patch acceptance
> 
> Here is the status on quota test-case spurious failure:
> 
> There were 3 issues
> 1) Quota exceeding the limit because of parallel writes - Merged
> Upstream, patch submitted to release-3.7 #10910
>          ./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1038598.t
>          ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1161156.t
> 2) Quoting accounting going wrong - Patch Submitted #10918
>          ./tests/basic/ec/quota.t
>          ./tests/basic/quota-nfs.t
> 3) Quota with anonymous FDs on NetBSD:
>     This is NFS client caching issue on NetBSD. Sachin and Myself are
> working on this issue.
>          ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Vijay
> 
> 
> On Friday 22 May 2015 11:45 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> > On 05/21/2015 12:07 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> >> On 05/19/2015 11:56 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> >>> On 05/18/2015 08:03 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> >>>> On 05/16/2015 03:34 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I will send daily status updates from Monday (05/18) about this so
> >>>>> that
> >>>>> we are clear about where we are and what needs to be done to remove
> >>>>> this
> >>>>> moratorium. Appreciate your help in having a clean set of regression
> >>>>> tests going forward!
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> We have made some progress since Saturday. The problem with glupy.t
> >>>> has
> >>>> been fixed - thanks to Niels! All but following tests have developers
> >>>> looking into them:
> >>>>
> >>>>      ./tests/basic/afr/entry-self-heal.t
> >>>>
> >>>>      ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-976800.t
> >>>>
> >>>>      ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1015990.t
> >>>>
> >>>>      ./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1038598.t
> >>>>
> >>>>      ./tests/basic/ec/quota.t
> >>>>
> >>>>      ./tests/basic/quota-nfs.t
> >>>>
> >>>>      ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-974007.t
> >>>>
> >>>> Can submitters of these test cases or current feature owners pick
> >>>> these
> >>>> up and start looking into the failures please? Do update the spurious
> >>>> failures etherpad [1] once you pick up a particular test.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Update for today - all tests that are known to fail have owners. Thanks
> >>> everyone for chipping in! I think we should be able to lift this
> >>> moratorium and resume normal patch acceptance shortly.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Today's update - Pranith fixed a bunch of failures in erasure coding and
> >> Avra removed a test that was not relevant anymore - thanks for that!
> >>
> >> Quota, afr, snapshot & tiering tests are being looked into. Will provide
> >> an update on where we are with these tomorrow.
> >>
> >
> > A few tests have not been readily reproducible. Of the remaining
> > tests, all but the following have either been root caused or we have
> > patches in review:
> >
> >     ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t
> >     ./tests/performance/open-behind.t
> >     ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-2.t
> >     ./tests/basic/quota-nfs.t
> >
> > With some reviews and investigations of failing tests happening over
> > the weekend, I am optimistic about being able to accept patches as
> > usual from early next week.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Vijay
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>