[Gluster-devel] Moratorium on new patch acceptance

[Vijaikumar M]

Here is the status on quota test-case spurious failure:

There were 3 issues
1) Quota exceeding the limit because of parallel writes - Merged 
Upstream, patch submitted to release-3.7 #10910
         ./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1038598.t
         ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1161156.t
2) Quoting accounting going wrong - Patch Submitted #10918
         ./tests/basic/ec/quota.t
         ./tests/basic/quota-nfs.t
3) Quota with anonymous FDs on NetBSD:
    This is NFS client caching issue on NetBSD. Sachin and Myself are 
working on this issue.
         ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t


Thanks,
Vijay


On Friday 22 May 2015 11:45 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On 05/21/2015 12:07 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>> On 05/19/2015 11:56 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>>> On 05/18/2015 08:03 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>>>> On 05/16/2015 03:34 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I will send daily status updates from Monday (05/18) about this so 
>>>>> that
>>>>> we are clear about where we are and what needs to be done to remove
>>>>> this
>>>>> moratorium. Appreciate your help in having a clean set of regression
>>>>> tests going forward!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We have made some progress since Saturday. The problem with glupy.t 
>>>> has
>>>> been fixed - thanks to Niels! All but following tests have developers
>>>> looking into them:
>>>>
>>>>      ./tests/basic/afr/entry-self-heal.t
>>>>
>>>>      ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-976800.t
>>>>
>>>>      ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1015990.t
>>>>
>>>>      ./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1038598.t
>>>>
>>>>      ./tests/basic/ec/quota.t
>>>>
>>>>      ./tests/basic/quota-nfs.t
>>>>
>>>>      ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-974007.t
>>>>
>>>> Can submitters of these test cases or current feature owners pick 
>>>> these
>>>> up and start looking into the failures please? Do update the spurious
>>>> failures etherpad [1] once you pick up a particular test.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures
>>>
>>>
>>> Update for today - all tests that are known to fail have owners. Thanks
>>> everyone for chipping in! I think we should be able to lift this
>>> moratorium and resume normal patch acceptance shortly.
>>>
>>
>> Today's update - Pranith fixed a bunch of failures in erasure coding and
>> Avra removed a test that was not relevant anymore - thanks for that!
>>
>> Quota, afr, snapshot & tiering tests are being looked into. Will provide
>> an update on where we are with these tomorrow.
>>
>
> A few tests have not been readily reproducible. Of the remaining 
> tests, all but the following have either been root caused or we have 
> patches in review:
>
>     ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t
>     ./tests/performance/open-behind.t
>     ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-2.t
>     ./tests/basic/quota-nfs.t
>
> With some reviews and investigations of failing tests happening over 
> the weekend, I am optimistic about being able to accept patches as 
> usual from early next week.
>
> Thanks,
> Vijay
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel