[Gluster-devel] tests and umount

[Pranith Kumar Karampuri]

On 06/18/2014 10:49 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>
> On 06/16/2014 09:08 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>>
>> On 06/16/2014 09:00 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>>>>        I see that most of the tests are doing umount and these may 
>>>> fail
>>>> sometimes because of EBUSY etc. I am wondering if we should change all
>>>> of them to umount -l.
>>>> Let me know if you foresee any problems.
>>> I think I'd try "umount -f" first.  Using -l too much can cause an
>>> accumulation of zombie mounts.  When I'm hacking around on my own, I
>>> sometimes have to do "umount -f" twice but that's always sufficient.
>> Cool, I will do some kind of EXPECT_WITHIN with umount -f may be 5 
>> times just to be on the safer side.
> I submitted http://review.gluster.com/8104 for one of the tests as it 
> is failing frequently. Will do the next round later.
http://review.gluster.org/8117 fixes the rest.

Pranith
>
> Pranith
>>
>> If no one has any objections I will send out a patch tomorrow for this.
>>
>> Pranith
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel