[Gluster-devel] tests and umount

[Justin Clift]

On 18/06/2014, at 6:19 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> On 06/16/2014 09:08 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>> 
>> On 06/16/2014 09:00 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>>>>       I see that most of the tests are doing umount and these may fail
>>>> sometimes because of EBUSY etc. I am wondering if we should change all
>>>> of them to umount -l.
>>>> Let me know if you foresee any problems.
>>> I think I'd try "umount -f" first.  Using -l too much can cause an
>>> accumulation of zombie mounts.  When I'm hacking around on my own, I
>>> sometimes have to do "umount -f" twice but that's always sufficient.
>> Cool, I will do some kind of EXPECT_WITHIN with umount -f may be 5 times just to be on the safer side.
> I submitted http://review.gluster.com/8104 for one of the tests as it is failing frequently. Will do the next round later.

Would either of you have time to 2nd review this:

  http://review.gluster.com/8104

It's for fixing the bug-859581.t spurious failure.

You both had Gerrit CR's that failed yesterday due to this. ;)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift