[Gluster-devel] tests and umount

[Pranith Kumar Karampuri]

On 06/16/2014 09:08 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>
> On 06/16/2014 09:00 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>>>        I see that most of the tests are doing umount and these may fail
>>> sometimes because of EBUSY etc. I am wondering if we should change all
>>> of them to umount -l.
>>> Let me know if you foresee any problems.
>> I think I'd try "umount -f" first.  Using -l too much can cause an
>> accumulation of zombie mounts.  When I'm hacking around on my own, I
>> sometimes have to do "umount -f" twice but that's always sufficient.
> Cool, I will do some kind of EXPECT_WITHIN with umount -f may be 5 
> times just to be on the safer side.
I submitted http://review.gluster.com/8104 for one of the tests as it is 
failing frequently. Will do the next round later.

Pranith
>
> If no one has any objections I will send out a patch tomorrow for this.
>
> Pranith
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel