[Gluster-devel] Proposal for some RPM packaging changes

James purpleidea at gmail.com
Tue Feb 18 16:48:15 UTC 2014

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote:
> Actually, it doesn't.
> glusterfs-geo-replication _does_ reguire glusterfs-server.
> glusterfs-server _does not_ require glusterfs-geo-replication.

This makes sense, and is what I'd expect... And with that, as long as
it's not pedantic, I'd recommend they stay as separate packages. It
makes total sense that geo-replication pulls in glusterfs-server, but
not the other way around.

More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list