[Gluster-devel] Proposal for some RPM packaging changes

[James]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Actually, it doesn't.
>
> glusterfs-geo-replication _does_ reguire glusterfs-server.
>
> glusterfs-server _does not_ require glusterfs-geo-replication.

This makes sense, and is what I'd expect... And with that, as long as
it's not pedantic, I'd recommend they stay as separate packages. It
makes total sense that geo-replication pulls in glusterfs-server, but
not the other way around.