[Gluster-devel] is the wiki cluster afr example correct ?
sebastien.couppey at zero9.it
Fri Jan 11 08:27:02 UTC 2008
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:44:33AM -0800, matthew zeier wrote:
> Matthias Saou wrote:
>> Maybe a silly question, then, but what is the namespace useful for in
>> that example, then?
> Just for this part:
> volume bricks
> type cluster/unify
> subvolumes afr1 afr2
> option scheduler rr
> option namespace brick-ns
> option rr.limits.min-free-disk 5%
> But you're right - brick-ns isn't redundant.
> Perhaps that example should be cleaned up? I know I was confused about it
cleanup or have also brick-ns replicated. Because according to my
tests, when I loose my NS ... I loose all the remote files.
More information about the Gluster-devel