[Gluster-devel] is the wiki cluster afr example correct ?

[Sebastien COUPPEY]

On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:44:33AM -0800, matthew zeier wrote:
>
>
> Matthias Saou wrote:
>> Maybe a silly question, then, but what is the namespace useful for in
>> that example, then?
>
> Just for this part:
>
> volume bricks
>   type cluster/unify
>   subvolumes afr1 afr2
>   option scheduler rr
>   option namespace brick-ns
>   option rr.limits.min-free-disk 5%
> end-volume
>
> But you're right - brick-ns isn't redundant.
>
> Perhaps that example should be cleaned up?  I know I was confused about it 
> too.

cleanup or have also brick-ns replicated. Because according to my
tests, when I loose my NS ... I loose all the remote files.