[Gluster-devel] is the wiki cluster afr example correct ?
mrz at mozilla.com
Fri Jan 11 09:03:22 UTC 2008
afr'd is what I meant and somewhere there should be docs on what the
namespace is for and what happens when it's not there... suppose when I
find time I could edit that wiki...
Sebastien COUPPEY wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:44:33AM -0800, matthew zeier wrote:
>> Matthias Saou wrote:
>>> Maybe a silly question, then, but what is the namespace useful for in
>>> that example, then?
>> Just for this part:
>> volume bricks
>> type cluster/unify
>> subvolumes afr1 afr2
>> option scheduler rr
>> option namespace brick-ns
>> option rr.limits.min-free-disk 5%
>> But you're right - brick-ns isn't redundant.
>> Perhaps that example should be cleaned up? I know I was confused about it
> cleanup or have also brick-ns replicated. Because according to my
> tests, when I loose my NS ... I loose all the remote files.
matthew zeier | Network Engineer | Mozilla Corp. | (650)903-0800 x219
More information about the Gluster-devel