[Gluster-devel] is the wiki cluster afr example correct ?

[matthew zeier]

Matthias Saou wrote:
> Maybe a silly question, then, but what is the namespace useful for in
> that example, then?

Just for this part:

volume bricks
   type cluster/unify
   subvolumes afr1 afr2
   option scheduler rr
   option namespace brick-ns
   option rr.limits.min-free-disk 5%
end-volume

But you're right - brick-ns isn't redundant.

Perhaps that example should be cleaned up?  I know I was confused about 
it too.