[Gluster-devel] is the wiki cluster afr example correct ?

[Matthias Saou]

Maybe a silly question, then, but what is the namespace useful for in
that example, then?

Matthias

Anand Avati wrote :

> the article is right. AFR itself does intelligent failover. and you do not
> need a namespace unless you use unify.
> 
> avati
> 
> 2008/1/10, Sebastien COUPPEY <sebastien.couppey at zero9.it>:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/Understanding_AFR_Translator
> >
> > the cluster example starting at :  Clustered Mode
> > does't seems to me to be redundant as if the brick1 goes down, the
> > namespace is not available anymore and the files are also not
> > available anymore.
> >
> > Am I wrong ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) - Linux kernel 2.6.23.9-85.fc8
Load : 0.44 0.27 0.27