[Gluster-devel] glusterfs process grows pretty large?

[Dale Dude]

Thanks for the work ;)

Is it safe to reboot that box? Wanna try 270 on it. Trying 270 on 
another similar setup with one brick of 5tb but memory is about 600megz, 
but the rsync is still running so Ill wait on a decision on that one. 
glusterfsd and glusterfs seem to start with 100megz each now. Is that 
expected?

Regards,
Dale

Amar S. Tumballi wrote:
> Hi Dale,
>  Now with patch-270, memory leak should not be seen. A big thanks for 
> giving access to your machine, as it was hard for me to replicate the 
> same setup here.
>
> -bulde
>
> On 7/3/07, *Dale Dude* <dale at oc3networks.com 
> <mailto:dale at oc3networks.com>> wrote:
>
>     Im running 3 rsyncs in parallel and glusterfs gets to about
>     400megz. Is
>     glusterfs supposed to grow so large? It seems to reduce memory
>     (sometimes) when the rsync is done.
>
>            CMD COUNT USER-TIME SYS-TIME MEM-TOTAL
>     glusterfs     1     9m53s    2m32s 401.73 MiB
>          rsync     4       11s      25s 337.90 MiB
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Gluster-devel mailing list
>     Gluster-devel at nongnu.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at nongnu.org>
>     http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Amar Tumballi
> http://amar.80x25.org
> [bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]