[Gluster-devel] glusterfs process grows pretty large?

Amar S. Tumballi amar at zresearch.com
Thu Jul 5 01:19:50 UTC 2007


Hi Dale,
 Now with patch-270, memory leak should not be seen. A big thanks for giving
access to your machine, as it was hard for me to replicate the same setup
here.

-bulde

On 7/3/07, Dale Dude <dale at oc3networks.com> wrote:
>
> Im running 3 rsyncs in parallel and glusterfs gets to about 400megz. Is
> glusterfs supposed to grow so large? It seems to reduce memory
> (sometimes) when the rsync is done.
>
>        CMD COUNT USER-TIME SYS-TIME MEM-TOTAL
> glusterfs     1     9m53s    2m32s 401.73 MiB
>      rsync     4       11s      25s 337.90 MiB
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
Amar Tumballi
http://amar.80x25.org
[bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]



More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list