[Gluster-devel] glusterfs process grows pretty large?

[Amar S. Tumballi]

You can reboot the machine.

About the 100megz its virtual-address usage which is very high due to
io-threads. you can see the difference by reducing the thread-count option
of io-threads. Otherwise in real they consume approximately 2-3MB when
started.

-bulde

On 7/5/07, Dale Dude <dale at oc3networks.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the work ;)
>
> Is it safe to reboot that box? Wanna try 270 on it. Trying 270 on
> another similar setup with one brick of 5tb but memory is about 600megz,
> but the rsync is still running so Ill wait on a decision on that one.
> glusterfsd and glusterfs seem to start with 100megz each now. Is that
> expected?
>
> Regards,
> Dale
>
> Amar S. Tumballi wrote:
> > Hi Dale,
> >  Now with patch-270, memory leak should not be seen. A big thanks for
> > giving access to your machine, as it was hard for me to replicate the
> > same setup here.
> >
> > -bulde
> >
> > On 7/3/07, *Dale Dude* <dale at oc3networks.com
> > <mailto:dale at oc3networks.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Im running 3 rsyncs in parallel and glusterfs gets to about
> >     400megz. Is
> >     glusterfs supposed to grow so large? It seems to reduce memory
> >     (sometimes) when the rsync is done.
> >
> >            CMD COUNT USER-TIME SYS-TIME MEM-TOTAL
> >     glusterfs     1     9m53s    2m32s 401.73 MiB
> >          rsync     4       11s      25s 337.90 MiB
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Gluster-devel mailing list
> >     Gluster-devel at nongnu.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at nongnu.org>
> >     http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Amar Tumballi
> > http://amar.80x25.org
> > [bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
Amar Tumballi
http://amar.80x25.org
[bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]