https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335373
Raghavendra G <rgowdapp at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |khiremat at redhat.com
Flags| |needinfo?(khiremat at redhat.c
| |om)
--- Comment #13 from Raghavendra G <rgowdapp at redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Raghavendra G from comment #12)
> (In reply to Amar Tumballi from comment #10)
> > Raghavendra, Yes, SDFS has performance impact. But the feature is still
> > present and can be enabled if user's work load demands it.
> >
> > My reasoning of closing this bug was mainly because for none of our users,
> > this particular case was not hit (ie, there are no reports of it). So,
> > focusing on that work when no one needs it is meaningless, that too when
> > there are options available.
>
> The second claim about no user has hit it is wrong. To repost the link I
> posted in comment #8 -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696353#c11. Also I've found
> this scenario on SAS setups too -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581306#c47
Also, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1600923 on geo-rep setups.
IIRC, this bug when hit affects Geo-rep. Putting needinfo on Kotresh and
Rochelle to explain how this bug, affects geo-rep.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.