[Bugs] [Bug 1421649] When using a fuse mount for client, EC volumes do not mount.

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421649

Anoop C S <anoopcs at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(xhernandez at datala
                   |                            |b.es)



--- Comment #9 from Anoop C S <anoopcs at redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Shyamsundar from comment #8)
> (In reply to Anoop C S from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Xavier Hernandez from comment #5)
> > > Nigel, do we really need to block 3.10.0 for this problem ?
> > > 
> > > There's already a patch to avoid failures when mmap() or anything else
> > > related to the dynamic code generation fails
> > > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421955). It simply falls back
> > > to the precompiled code instead of causing fatal failures.
> > > 
> > > This is not the best solution but allows disperse to be used, at least until
> > > a proper solution for the selinux problem is found and implemented. It's
> > > also a good solution for any possible future change or OS problem that could
> > > cause this to fail again.
> > > 
> > > Another workaround is to manually disable dynamic code generation by using
> > > option disperse.cpu-extensions = none.
> > 
> > Additionally we also need to make sure that these are clearly documented in
> > the release notes for 3.10.
> 
> If https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421955 is taken in, what
> additional release notes are required? I need them ASAP so that the same can
> be updated.
> 
> Further, removing this from the 3.10 blocker list as per the discussion here.

I thought it would be better to add a note about this fallback mechanism which
we do internally instead of explicitly setting the specified volume set option.
As you know I am not an expert in EC. I will leave it for Xavi to have a final
word.

Xavi,
What do you think of adding a note in release notes for 3.10 regarding the
internal fallback we do with https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16614/?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YOVagzN52t&a=cc_unsubscribe