[Bugs] [Bug 1347329] a two node glusterfs seems not possible anymore?!

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 21 12:11:56 UTC 2016


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347329

Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|---                         |NOTABUG
        Last Closed|                            |2016-06-21 08:11:56



--- Comment #2 from Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> ---
Is there any specific reason why are we considering quorum tunables with a two
node set up? Ideally we should consider the quorum options in case of at least
three node set up. Also as Joe pointed out on a two node set up, if one of the
node goes for a reboot while the other is down, the daemons do not get spawned
as data consistency is not guaranteed here. The moment the peer update is
received the daemons are spawned. IMO, this is an expected behaviour as per the
design. I am closing this bug, please feel free to reopen if you think
otherwise.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the Bugs mailing list