[Bugs] [Bug 1408785] with granular-entry-self-heal enabled i see that there is a gfid mismatch and vm goes to paused state after migrating to another host
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Dec 28 09:06:51 UTC 2016
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408785
--- Comment #3 from Worker Ant <bugzilla-bot at gluster.org> ---
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/16294 committed in release-3.9 by Pranith
Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu at redhat.com)
------
commit 544f6ce9e7a249360166e98dd7df1b09f91717a9
Author: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com>
Date: Mon Dec 26 21:08:03 2016 +0530
cluster/afr: Fix missing name indices due to EEXIST error
Backport of: http://review.gluster.org/16286
PROBLEM:
Consider a volume with granular-entry-heal and sharding enabled. When
a replica is down and a shard is created as part of a write, the name
index is correctly created under indices/entry-changes/<dot-shard-gfid>.
Now when a read on the same region triggers another MKNOD, the fop
fails on the online bricks with EEXIST. By virtue of this being a
symmetric error, the failed_subvols[] array is reset to all zeroes.
Because of this, before post-op, the GF_XATTROP_ENTRY_OUT_KEY will be
set, causing the name index, which was created in the previous MKNOD
operation, to be wrongly deleted in THIS MKNOD operation.
FIX:
The ideal fix would have been for a transaction to delete the name
index ONLY if it knows it is the one that created the index in the first
place. This would involve gathering information as to whether THIS xattrop
created the index from individual bricks, aggregating their responses and
based on the various posisble combinations of responses, decide whether to
delete the index or not. This is rather complex. Simpler fix would be
for post-op to examine local->op_ret in the event of no failed_subvols
to figure out whether to delete the name index or not. This can
occasionally
lead to creation of stale name indices but they won't be affecting the IO
path
or mess with pending changelogs in any way and self-heal in its crawl of
"entry-changes" directory would take care to delete such indices.
Change-Id: I8c5c08b7a208e840b5970fe5699dabdaf751a150
BUG: 1408785
Signed-off-by: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/16294
Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins at build.gluster.org>
CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins at build.gluster.org>
NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins at build.gluster.org>
Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu at redhat.com>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vxZUIZ1wpK&a=cc_unsubscribe
More information about the Bugs
mailing list