[Bugs] [Bug 1138897] NetBSD port
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Sep 30 16:50:30 UTC 2014
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138897
--- Comment #37 from Anand Avati <aavati at redhat.com> ---
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/8860 committed in release-3.6 by Vijay Bellur
(vbellur at redhat.com)
------
commit 912eec63f43fda453e4210bfa82336a877a15d38
Author: Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu at netbsd.org>
Date: Mon Sep 29 03:15:20 2014 +0200
Fix invalid seekdir() usage
According to POSIX, seekdir() should only be given offset obtained from
telldir() on the same DIR *
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/seekdir.html
Code from afr-self-heald.c and index.c is operating outside of the
specification, by doing using seekdir() with offset from a previously
open/close/re-open directory. This seems to work on Linux (although with
no guarantee it will always in the future). On NetBSD the seekdir()
with a in invalid offset is a nilpotent operation, and causes an infinite
loop, since index_fill_readdir() always restart from the beginning of the
directory.
The situation is fixed by using a non anonymous fd in afr-self-heald.c:
we explicitely open the directory so that it remains open on the brick
side during the timeframe where we want to reuse offsets in seekdir().
This requires adding an opendir fop in index xlator.
If the brick was not updated, the opendir will fail and we fallback
to the standard violating approach for backward compatibility on Linux.
On other systems we fail since it never worked.
While there, add tests to check seekdir() success in index and posix
xlators, so that incorrect usage from calling code produce an explicit
error instead of an infinite loop. We can only do it on non Linux systems,
for the sake of backward compatibility when the brick was updated but
not the client.
Backport of I88ca90acfcfee280988124bd6addc1a1893ca7ab
BUG: 1138897
Change-Id: I5446a9a17d5451ec5aab8fbd10d381da9a0a23ad
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu at netbsd.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/8860
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins at build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu at redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=njZVYX2IaV&a=cc_unsubscribe
More information about the Bugs
mailing list