[gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.12.3 released

[Niels de Vos]

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 07:30:40AM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> In all this please keep in mind that Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, and SuSE
> all have python-jwt and all have this functionality, and the CentOS
> packages will not be a (feature) parity with the other 3.12.3 packages
> if the python-jwt changes are reverted for CentOS.

Indeed, and that is one of the main reasons to provide an update in case
an alternative backport is available before 3.12.4.

Niels


> 
> 
> 
> On 11/22/2017 04:36 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:38:32AM +0530, Aravinda wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 21 November 2017 08:29 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:06:59AM +0530, Aravinda wrote:
> >>>> Hi Niels,
> >>>>
> >>>> I over looked the email about 3.12.3 release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please suggest what we can do for this package dependency. This is runtime
> >>>> dependency for one of the sub feature, if it is delaying other things then
> >>>> we can remove this dependency from spec file.(All features work except
> >>>> signing the webhook data).
> >>> Hmm, normally new features do not get backported to prevent unforseen
> >>> problems...
> >>>
> >>> We have been delayed quite a bit already, users are asking for the
> >>> packages. If dropping the dependency from the .spec does not result in
> >>> errors or tracebacks, that would be one approach. Can you please confirm
> >>> that there are no problems when the package is missing?
> >> Without the dependency, BZ 1501864 will not work. I will start working on
> >> the alternate approach without using that library. We can remove from
> >> dependency list now.
> >>
> >> @Sahina, Is it possible to wait for this feature till 3.12.4 release?
> > 
> > Many thanks Aravinda! I've spoken with Jiffin (one of the 3.12 release
> > managers) about this as well now. I will revert the change in the
> > packaging for the CentOS Storage SIG, both the code and the dependency.
> > 
> > If a good alternative comes up, and the feature is critical to be in
> > 3.12, we can do an update of the RPMs or wait for 3.12.4+.
> > 
> > Niels
> > 
> > 
> >>> If there is, we'll just bite the bullet and include python-jws-1.5 in
> >>> the CentOS Storage SIG while keeping an eye on the Fedora package for
> >>> updates. Additional maintainers for this and other packages are much
> >>> wanted.
> >>>
> >>> Niels
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Monday 20 November 2017 09:59 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Aravinda,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A reply on the questions below is still outstanding. At the moment, I
> >>>>> tend to think that using the most recent python-jwt package from Fedora
> >>>>> is the most reasonable approach. It is a little more maintained there,
> >>>>> and the CentOS Storage SIG can then piggy-back on the coming bugfixes
> >>>>> and updates.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is there someone who wants to maintain/assist with watching over
> >>>>> python-jwt for the CentOS Storage SIG?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Niels
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:22:52PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:39:46AM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org wrote:
> >>>>>>> SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.tar.gz
> >>>>>>> HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.sha256sum
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This release is made off jenkins-release-21
> >>>>>> This release adds an additional dependency for the glusterfs-events
> >>>>>> sub-package (https://review.gluster.org/18519). There is no python-jwt
> >>>>>> in RHEL/CentOS-7 so, we'll need to ship (and maintain!) this new package
> >>>>>> in the CentOS Storage SIG.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Will python-jwt become part of RHEL at one point? Which version will be
> >>>>>> included in that case? I would prefer not to have to maintain python-jwt
> >>>>>> longer than necessary, and when RHEL-7 ships this package, it should
> >>>>>> ideally update the version I need to add to the Storage SIG.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [Obviously this delays packaging the update for CentOS.]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Niels
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> packaging mailing list
> >>>>>> packaging at gluster.org
> >>>>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
> >>>>
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> regards
> >>>> Aravinda VK
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> regards
> >> Aravinda VK
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > packaging mailing list
> > packaging at gluster.org
> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
> > 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Kaleb