[gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.12.3 released

Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeithle at redhat.com
Wed Nov 22 12:30:40 UTC 2017

In all this please keep in mind that Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, and SuSE
all have python-jwt and all have this functionality, and the CentOS
packages will not be a (feature) parity with the other 3.12.3 packages
if the python-jwt changes are reverted for CentOS.

On 11/22/2017 04:36 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:38:32AM +0530, Aravinda wrote:
>> On Tuesday 21 November 2017 08:29 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:06:59AM +0530, Aravinda wrote:
>>>> Hi Niels,
>>>> I over looked the email about 3.12.3 release.
>>>> Please suggest what we can do for this package dependency. This is runtime
>>>> dependency for one of the sub feature, if it is delaying other things then
>>>> we can remove this dependency from spec file.(All features work except
>>>> signing the webhook data).
>>> Hmm, normally new features do not get backported to prevent unforseen
>>> problems...
>>> We have been delayed quite a bit already, users are asking for the
>>> packages. If dropping the dependency from the .spec does not result in
>>> errors or tracebacks, that would be one approach. Can you please confirm
>>> that there are no problems when the package is missing?
>> Without the dependency, BZ 1501864 will not work. I will start working on
>> the alternate approach without using that library. We can remove from
>> dependency list now.
>> @Sahina, Is it possible to wait for this feature till 3.12.4 release?
> Many thanks Aravinda! I've spoken with Jiffin (one of the 3.12 release
> managers) about this as well now. I will revert the change in the
> packaging for the CentOS Storage SIG, both the code and the dependency.
> If a good alternative comes up, and the feature is critical to be in
> 3.12, we can do an update of the RPMs or wait for 3.12.4+.
> Niels
>>> If there is, we'll just bite the bullet and include python-jws-1.5 in
>>> the CentOS Storage SIG while keeping an eye on the Fedora package for
>>> updates. Additional maintainers for this and other packages are much
>>> wanted.
>>> Niels
>>>> On Monday 20 November 2017 09:59 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>>>> Hi Aravinda,
>>>>> A reply on the questions below is still outstanding. At the moment, I
>>>>> tend to think that using the most recent python-jwt package from Fedora
>>>>> is the most reasonable approach. It is a little more maintained there,
>>>>> and the CentOS Storage SIG can then piggy-back on the coming bugfixes
>>>>> and updates.
>>>>> Is there someone who wants to maintain/assist with watching over
>>>>> python-jwt for the CentOS Storage SIG?
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Niels
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:22:52PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:39:46AM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org wrote:
>>>>>>> SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.tar.gz
>>>>>>> HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.sha256sum
>>>>>>> This release is made off jenkins-release-21
>>>>>> This release adds an additional dependency for the glusterfs-events
>>>>>> sub-package (https://review.gluster.org/18519). There is no python-jwt
>>>>>> in RHEL/CentOS-7 so, we'll need to ship (and maintain!) this new package
>>>>>> in the CentOS Storage SIG.
>>>>>> Will python-jwt become part of RHEL at one point? Which version will be
>>>>>> included in that case? I would prefer not to have to maintain python-jwt
>>>>>> longer than necessary, and when RHEL-7 ships this package, it should
>>>>>> ideally update the version I need to add to the Storage SIG.
>>>>>> [Obviously this delays packaging the update for CentOS.]
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Niels
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> packaging mailing list
>>>>>> packaging at gluster.org
>>>>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>>>> -- 
>>>> regards
>>>> Aravinda VK
>> -- 
>> regards
>> Aravinda VK
> _______________________________________________
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



More information about the packaging mailing list