[gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.12.3 released
avishwan at redhat.com
Tue Nov 21 05:36:59 UTC 2017
I over looked the email about 3.12.3 release.
Please suggest what we can do for this package dependency. This is
runtime dependency for one of the sub feature, if it is delaying other
things then we can remove this dependency from spec file.(All features
work except signing the webhook data).
On Monday 20 November 2017 09:59 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> Hi Aravinda,
> A reply on the questions below is still outstanding. At the moment, I
> tend to think that using the most recent python-jwt package from Fedora
> is the most reasonable approach. It is a little more maintained there,
> and the CentOS Storage SIG can then piggy-back on the coming bugfixes
> and updates.
> Is there someone who wants to maintain/assist with watching over
> python-jwt for the CentOS Storage SIG?
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:22:52PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:39:46AM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org wrote:
>>> SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.tar.gz
>>> HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.sha256sum
>>> This release is made off jenkins-release-21
>> This release adds an additional dependency for the glusterfs-events
>> sub-package (https://review.gluster.org/18519). There is no python-jwt
>> in RHEL/CentOS-7 so, we'll need to ship (and maintain!) this new package
>> in the CentOS Storage SIG.
>> Will python-jwt become part of RHEL at one point? Which version will be
>> included in that case? I would prefer not to have to maintain python-jwt
>> longer than necessary, and when RHEL-7 ships this package, it should
>> ideally update the version I need to add to the Storage SIG.
>> [Obviously this delays packaging the update for CentOS.]
>> packaging mailing list
>> packaging at gluster.org
More information about the packaging