[gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.12.3 released

Niels de Vos ndevos at redhat.com
Mon Nov 20 16:29:27 UTC 2017

Hi Aravinda,

A reply on the questions below is still outstanding. At the moment, I
tend to think that using the most recent python-jwt package from Fedora
is the most reasonable approach. It is a little more maintained there,
and the CentOS Storage SIG can then piggy-back on the coming bugfixes
and updates.

Is there someone who wants to maintain/assist with watching over
python-jwt for the CentOS Storage SIG?


On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:22:52PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:39:46AM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org wrote:
> > SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.tar.gz
> > HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.sha256sum
> > 
> > This release is made off jenkins-release-21
> This release adds an additional dependency for the glusterfs-events
> sub-package (https://review.gluster.org/18519). There is no python-jwt
> in RHEL/CentOS-7 so, we'll need to ship (and maintain!) this new package
> in the CentOS Storage SIG.
> Will python-jwt become part of RHEL at one point? Which version will be
> included in that case? I would prefer not to have to maintain python-jwt
> longer than necessary, and when RHEL-7 ships this package, it should
> ideally update the version I need to add to the Storage SIG.
> [Obviously this delays packaging the update for CentOS.]
> Thanks,
> Niels
> _______________________________________________
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

More information about the packaging mailing list