[gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.9rc1 has been released for testing
Niels de Vos
niels at nixpanic.net
Fri Sep 23 17:27:12 UTC 2016
On Fri Sep 23 19:08:44 2016 GMT+0200, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 09/23/2016 01:05 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com
> > <mailto:kkeithle at redhat.com>> wrote:
> > <top post>
> > If there's another RC, please follow the naming convention that we
> > agreed on in the dim, distant past of 3.9.0rcX.
> > Note the .0 in there.
> > 3.9rcX (without the .0) is mildly annoying from a packaging perspective.
> > And be sure that the GA is tagged and released as 3.9.0.
> > We do have a history of using both 3.9rcX and 3.9.0rcX in the past. But
> > please stick to the One True convention of 3.9.0rcX.
> > We tried to keep it as close as possible to 3.8
> > v3.8rc0
> > v3.8rc1
> > v3.8rc2
> > v3.9rc0
> > v3.9rc1
> > ...
> Yes, that was annoying then too.
> > Do you want this to be changed in future?
> Yes please.
Whatever is picked, make sure that the 3.9.0 version is seen as newer. You can use the rpmdev-vercmp command to verify that.
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at gluster.org
Sent from my Jolla w/ the Open Source friendly services from kolabnow.com
More information about the packaging