[gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.9rc1 has been released for testing

[Niels de Vos]

On Fri Sep 23 19:08:44 2016 GMT+0200, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 09/23/2016 01:05 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com
> > <mailto:kkeithle at redhat.com>> wrote:
> > 
> >     <top post>
> >     If there's another RC, please follow the naming convention that we
> >     agreed on in the dim, distant past of 3.9.0rcX.
> > 
> >     Note the .0 in there.
> > 
> >     3.9rcX (without the .0) is mildly annoying from a packaging perspective.
> > 
> >     And be sure that the GA is tagged and released as 3.9.0.
> > 
> >     We do have a history of using both 3.9rcX and 3.9.0rcX in the past. But
> >     please stick to the One True convention of 3.9.0rcX.
> > 
> > 
> > We tried to keep it as close as possible to 3.8
> > v3.8rc0
> > v3.8rc1
> > v3.8rc2
> > v3.9rc0
> > v3.9rc1
> > ...
> > 
> 
> Yes, that was annoying then too.
> 
> 
> > Do you want this to be changed in future?
> 
> Yes please.

Whatever is picked, make sure that the 3.9.0 version is seen as newer. You can use the rpmdev-vercmp command to verify that.

Thanks!

> 
> -- 
> 
> Kaleb
> _______________________________________________
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>

-- 
Sent from my Jolla w/ the Open Source friendly services from kolabnow.com