[gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.9rc1 has been released for testing

[Kaleb S. KEITHLEY]

On 09/23/2016 01:27 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Fri Sep 23 19:08:44 2016 GMT+0200, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>> On 09/23/2016 01:05 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com
>>> <mailto:kkeithle at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     <top post>
>>>     If there's another RC, please follow the naming convention that we
>>>     agreed on in the dim, distant past of 3.9.0rcX.
>>>
>>>     Note the .0 in there.
>>>
>>>     3.9rcX (without the .0) is mildly annoying from a packaging perspective.
>>>
>>>     And be sure that the GA is tagged and released as 3.9.0.
>>>
>>>     We do have a history of using both 3.9rcX and 3.9.0rcX in the past. But
>>>     please stick to the One True convention of 3.9.0rcX.
>>>
>>>
>>> We tried to keep it as close as possible to 3.8
>>> v3.8rc0
>>> v3.8rc1
>>> v3.8rc2
>>> v3.9rc0
>>> v3.9rc1
>>> ...
>>>
>>
>> Yes, that was annoying then too.
>>
>>
>>> Do you want this to be changed in future?
>>
>> Yes please.
> 
> Whatever is picked, make sure that the 3.9.0 version is seen as newer. You can use the rpmdev-vercmp command to verify that.
> 

If I end up building 3.9rc1 packages, that's the easy part. RC packages
are glusterfs-3.9.0-0.XrcY.

Final packages are glusterfs-3.9.0-1.

But this is such a nuisance I'm probably not going to even bother.

-- 

Kaleb